Krebs Nicolle M, Allen Sophia I, Veldheer Susan, Martinez Diane J, Horn Kimberly, Livelsberger Craig, Modesto Jennifer, Kuprewicz Robin, Wilhelm Ashley, Hrabovsky Shari, Kazi Abid, Fazzi Alyse, Liao Jason, Zhu Junjia, Wasserman Emily, Reilly Samantha M, Reinhart Lisa, Trushin Neil, Moyer Robinn E, Bascom Rebecca, Foulds Jonathan, Richie John P, Muscat Joshua E
Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science, Pennsylvania State University, MC CH69, 500 University Drive, P.O. Box 850, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
The Milken School of Public Health, George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Ave. NW, Washington, D.C, 20052, USA.
Trials. 2017 Jul 3;18(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2038-9.
The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over the regulation of all tobacco products, including their nicotine content. Under this act, a major strategy to reduce harm from cigarette tobacco is lowering the nicotine content without causing unintended adverse consequences. Initial research on reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes has shown that smokers of these cigarettes gradually decrease their smoking frequency and biomarkers of exposure. The effectiveness of this strategy needs to be demonstrated in different populations whose response to RNC cigarettes might be substantially mediated by personal or environmental factors, such as low socioeconomic status (SES) populations. This study aims to evaluate the response to a reduced nicotine intervention in low SES smokers, as defined here as those with less than 16 years of education, by switching smokers from high nicotine commercial cigarettes to RNC cigarettes.
METHODS/DESIGN: Adults (N = 280) who have smoked five cigarettes or more per day for the past year, have not made a quit attempt in the prior month, are not planning to quit, and have less than 16 years of education are recruited into a two-arm, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. First, participants smoke their usual brand of cigarettes for 1 week and SPECTRUM research cigarettes containing a usual amount of nicotine for 2 weeks. During the experimental phase, participants are randomized to continue smoking SPECTRUM research cigarettes that contain either (1) usual nicotine content (UNC) (11.6 mg/cigarette) or (2) RNC (11.6 to 0.2 mg/cigarette) over 18 weeks. During the final phase of the study, all participants are offered the choice to quit smoking with nicotine replacement therapy, continue smoking the research cigarettes, or return to their usual brand of cigarettes. The primary outcomes of the study include retention rates and compliance with using only research cigarettes and no use of other nicotine-containing products. Secondary outcomes are tobacco smoke biomarkers, nicotine dependence measures, smoking topography, stress levels, and adverse health consequences.
Results from this study will provide information on whether low SES smokers can maintain a course of progressive nicotine reduction without increases in incidence of adverse effects.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01928719 . Registered on 21 August 2013.
《家庭吸烟预防与烟草控制法案》赋予了美国食品药品监督管理局对所有烟草制品进行监管的权力,包括其尼古丁含量。根据该法案,减少卷烟危害的一项主要策略是降低尼古丁含量,同时不产生意外的不良后果。对低尼古丁含量(RNC)卷烟的初步研究表明,吸食这些卷烟的吸烟者会逐渐降低吸烟频率以及接触生物标志物。这一策略的有效性需要在不同人群中得到验证,因为这些人群对RNC卷烟的反应可能会受到个人或环境因素的显著影响,比如社会经济地位较低(SES)的人群。本研究旨在评估社会经济地位较低的吸烟者对降低尼古丁干预措施的反应,这里将社会经济地位较低的吸烟者定义为受教育年限少于16年的吸烟者,研究方法是让吸烟者从高尼古丁商业卷烟改用RNC卷烟。
方法/设计:招募过去一年中每天吸烟5支或更多、前一个月没有尝试戒烟、目前不打算戒烟且受教育年限少于16年的成年人(N = 280),进行一项双臂双盲随机对照试验。首先,参与者吸食他们常用品牌的卷烟1周,然后吸食含常规尼古丁量的SPECTRUM研究卷烟2周。在实验阶段,参与者被随机分配,在18周内继续吸食SPECTRUM研究卷烟,这些卷烟要么(1)含有常规尼古丁含量(UNC)(每支11.6毫克),要么(2)含有低尼古丁含量(RNC)(每支11.6毫克至0.2毫克)。在研究的最后阶段,所有参与者都可以选择通过尼古丁替代疗法戒烟、继续吸食研究卷烟或回到他们常用品牌的卷烟。该研究的主要结局包括留存率以及仅使用研究卷烟且不使用其他含尼古丁产品的依从性。次要结局包括烟草烟雾生物标志物、尼古丁依赖测量、吸烟行为特征、压力水平和不良健康后果。
本研究结果将提供信息,以了解社会经济地位较低的吸烟者是否能够在不增加不良反应发生率的情况下维持逐步降低尼古丁含量的过程。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01928719。于2013年8月21日注册。