Suppr超能文献

巴西森林法作为终结非法砍伐手段的局限性。

Limits of Brazil's Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation.

机构信息

Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Lago Norte, Brasilia, DF 71503-505, Brazil.

Laboratório de Gestão de Serviços Ambientais, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 6627-Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 18;114(29):7653-7658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604768114. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

Abstract

The 2012 Brazilian Forest Code governs the fate of forests and savannas on Brazil's 394 Mha of privately owned lands. The government claims that a new national land registry (SICAR), introduced under the revised law, could end illegal deforestation by greatly reducing the cost of monitoring, enforcement, and compliance. This study evaluates that potential, using data from state-level land registries (CAR) in Pará and Mato Grosso that were precursors of SICAR. Using geospatial analyses and stakeholder interviews, we quantify the impact of CAR on deforestation and forest restoration, investigating how landowners adjust their behaviors over time. Our results indicate rapid adoption of CAR, with registered properties covering a total of 57 Mha by 2013. This suggests that the financial incentives to join CAR currently exceed the costs. Registered properties initially showed lower deforestation rates than unregistered ones, but these differences varied by property size and diminished over time. Moreover, only 6% of registered producers reported taking steps to restore illegally cleared areas on their properties. Our results suggest that, from the landowner's perspective, full compliance with the Forest Code offers few economic benefits. Achieving zero illegal deforestation in this context would require the private sector to include full compliance as a market criterion, while state and federal governments develop SICAR as a de facto enforcement mechanism. These results are relevant to other tropical countries and underscore the importance of developing a policy mix that creates lasting incentives for sustainable land-use practices.

摘要

2012 年巴西森林法规定了巴西 3940 万公顷私人土地上的森林和稀树草原的命运。政府声称,根据修订后的法律引入的新国家土地登记处(SICAR)可以通过大大降低监测、执法和合规成本来结束非法毁林现象。本研究利用 SICAR 的前身帕拉州和马托格罗索州的州级土地登记处(CAR)的数据来评估这种潜力。我们利用地理空间分析和利益相关者访谈,量化了 CAR 对毁林和森林恢复的影响,调查了土地所有者如何随着时间的推移调整他们的行为。我们的结果表明,CAR 得到了迅速采用,到 2013 年,已登记的财产总面积达到 5700 万公顷。这表明,加入 CAR 的经济激励目前超过了成本。登记财产最初的毁林率低于未登记财产,但这些差异因财产规模而异,并随着时间的推移而减少。此外,只有 6%的登记生产者报告采取措施恢复其财产上非法砍伐的区域。我们的结果表明,从土地所有者的角度来看,完全遵守森林法并没有带来多少经济利益。在这种情况下,要实现零非法毁林,私营部门需要将完全遵守作为一个市场标准,同时州和联邦政府将 SICAR 发展成为事实上的执法机制。这些结果与其他热带国家有关,强调了制定一个政策组合的重要性,该政策组合为可持续土地利用实践创造持久的激励。

相似文献

1
Limits of Brazil's Forest Code as a means to end illegal deforestation.巴西森林法作为终结非法砍伐手段的局限性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 18;114(29):7653-7658. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604768114. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
3
Land conflicts from overlapping claims in Brazil's rural environmental registry.巴西农村环境登记处重叠主张引发土地冲突。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2407357121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407357121. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries.设计一个保护发展中国家森林的碳市场。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2002 Aug 15;360(1797):1875-88. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2002.1037.

引用本文的文献

1
Land conflicts from overlapping claims in Brazil's rural environmental registry.巴西农村环境登记处重叠主张引发土地冲突。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Aug 13;121(33):e2407357121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407357121. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Brazil's Amazon Soy Moratorium reduced deforestation.巴西的亚马逊大豆禁伐令减少了森林砍伐。
Nat Food. 2020 Dec;1(12):801-810. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-00194-5. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century.二十一世纪的基于区域的保护。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7828):217-227. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon.巴西亚马孙自愿 REDD+ 项目的碳减排被夸大。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24188-24194. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004334117. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Brazil's Market for Trading Forest Certificates.巴西森林认证交易市场。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 6;11(4):e0152311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152311. eCollection 2016.
2
Policies undermine Brazil's GHG goals.政策有损巴西的温室气体减排目标。
Science. 2015 Oct 30;350(6260):519. doi: 10.1126/science.350.6260.519-a. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
Environment and development. Brazil's Soy Moratorium.环境与发展。巴西的大豆禁运令。
Science. 2015 Jan 23;347(6220):377-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa0181.
8
Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon.演员对巴西亚马逊地区森林砍伐减缓的特定贡献。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 28;111(43):15591-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322825111. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
10
Land use. Cracking Brazil's Forest Code.土地利用。破解巴西的森林法典。
Science. 2014 Apr 25;344(6182):363-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1246663.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验