Suppr超能文献

去增长——总结与审视一种新兴的学术范式

Degrowth - Taking Stock and Reviewing an Emerging Academic Paradigm.

作者信息

Weiss Martin, Cattaneo Claudio

机构信息

European Commission - Joint Research Centre, Directorate C - Energy, Transport and Climate, Sustainable Transport Unit, via Fermi 2749, TP 441, 21027 Ispra, Italy.

Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona Institute of Regional and Metropolitan Studies, 08193 Bellaterra, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Ecol Econ. 2017 Jul;137:220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.01.014.

Abstract

Degrowth has evolved within a decade from an activist movement into a multi-disciplinary academic paradigm. However, an overview taking stock of the peer-refereed degrowth literature is yet missing. Here, we review 91 articles that were published between 2006 and 2015. We find that the academic degrowth discourse occupies a small but expanding niche at the intersection of social and applied environmental sciences. The discourse is shaped by authors from high-income, mainly Mediterranean, countries. Until 2012, articles largely constitute conceptual essays endorsed by normative claims. More recently, degrowth has branched out into modelling, empirical assessments, and the study of concrete implementations. Authors tend to agree in that economic growth cannot be sustained on a resource constraint planet and that degrowth requires far reaching societal change. Whether degrowth should be considered as a collectively consented choice or an environmentally-imposed inevitability constitutes a major debate among degrowth thinkers. We argue that the academic discourse could benefit from rigid hypotheses testing through input-output modelling, material flow analysis, life-cycle assessments, or social surveys. By analyzing the potentials for non-market value creation and identifying concrete well-being benefits, the degrowth discourse could receive wider public support and contribute to a paradigmatic change in the social sciences.

摘要

“去增长”理念在十年内从一场激进主义运动发展成为一种多学科的学术范式。然而,目前仍缺少对经过同行评审的“去增长”文献的综述。在此,我们回顾了2006年至2015年间发表的91篇文章。我们发现,学术性的“去增长”话语在社会科学与应用环境科学的交叉领域占据了一个虽小但不断扩大的细分领域。该话语由来自高收入国家(主要是地中海国家)的作者主导。直到2012年,文章大多是由规范性主张支持的概念性论文。最近,“去增长”已扩展到建模、实证评估以及具体实施的研究。作者们倾向于认同,在资源受限的星球上经济增长无法持续,且“去增长”需要深远的社会变革。“去增长”应被视为一种集体认可的选择还是环境强加的必然结果,这是“去增长”思想者之间的一个主要争论点。我们认为,学术话语可以通过投入产出建模、物质流分析、生命周期评估或社会调查等严格的假设检验而受益。通过分析非市场价值创造的潜力并确定具体的福祉效益,“去增长”话语可以获得更广泛的公众支持,并有助于推动社会科学的范式转变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca70/5421156/60a6e45d4439/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验