Suppr超能文献

针对广场恐惧症的思维场疗法与认知行为疗法及等待名单对照:一项为期12个月随访的随机对照研究。

Thought Field Therapy Compared to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Wait-List for Agoraphobia: A Randomized, Controlled Study with a 12-Month Follow-up.

作者信息

Irgens Audun C, Hoffart Asle, Nysæter Tor E, Haaland Vegard Ø, Borge Finn-Magnus, Pripp Are H, Martinsen Egil W, Dammen Toril

机构信息

DPS Aust-Agder, Sørlandet HospitalArendal, Norway.

Research Institute, Modum BadVikersund, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 20;8:1027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01027. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Thought field therapy (TFT) is used for many psychiatric conditions, but its efficacy has not been sufficiently documented. Hence, there is a need for studies comparing TFT to well-established treatments. This study compares the efficacy of TFT and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for patients with agoraphobia. Seventy-two patients were randomized to CBT ( = 24), TFT ( = 24) or a wait-list condition (WLC) ( = 24) after a diagnostic procedure including the MINI PLUS that was performed before treatment or WLC. Following a 3 months waiting period, the WL patients were randomized to CBT ( = 12) or TFT ( = 12), and all patients were reassessed after treatment or waiting period and at 12 months follow-up. At first we compared the three groups CBT, TFT, and WL. After the post WL randomization, we compared CBT ( = 12 + 24 = 36) to TFT ( = 12 + 24 = 36), applying the pre-treatment scores as baseline for all patients. The primary outcome measure was a symptom score from the Anxiety Disorders Interview Scale that was performed by an interviewer blinded to the treatment condition. For statistical comparisons, we used the independent sample's -test, the Fisher's exact test and the ANOVA and ANCOVA tests. Both CBT and TFT showed better results than the WLC ( < 0.001) at post-treatment. Post-treatment and at the 12-month follow-up, there were not significant differences between CBT and TFT ( = 0.33 and = 0.90, respectively). This paper reports the first study comparing TFT to CBT for any disorder. The study indicated that TFT may be an efficient treatment for patients with agoraphobia. https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT00932919.

摘要

思维场疗法(TFT)被用于多种精神疾病,但尚未有充分的疗效记录。因此,需要开展研究将TFT与成熟的治疗方法进行比较。本研究比较了TFT和认知行为疗法(CBT)对广场恐惧症患者的疗效。72名患者在接受包括治疗前或等待期前进行的MINI PLUS在内的诊断程序后,被随机分为CBT组(n = 24)、TFT组(n = 24)或等待名单组(WLC)(n = 24)。经过3个月的等待期后,等待名单组患者被随机分为CBT组(n = 12)或TFT组(n = 12),所有患者在治疗或等待期结束后以及12个月随访时重新接受评估。首先,我们比较了CBT组、TFT组和等待名单组这三组。在等待名单组随机分组后,我们将CBT组(n = 12 + 24 = 36)与TFT组(n = 12 + 24 = 36)进行比较,将所有患者的治疗前评分作为基线。主要结局指标是由对治疗情况不知情的访谈者进行的焦虑症访谈量表的症状评分。为进行统计学比较,我们使用了独立样本t检验、Fisher精确检验以及方差分析和协方差分析。治疗后,CBT组和TFT组均比等待名单组显示出更好的结果(P < 0.001)。治疗后及12个月随访时,CBT组和TFT组之间无显著差异(分别为P = 0.33和P = 0.90)。本文报告了第一项针对任何疾病将TFT与CBT进行比较的研究。该研究表明,TFT可能是治疗广场恐惧症患者的一种有效疗法。https://clinicaltrials.gov/,标识符NCT00932919。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8010/5477545/0424fc1e7695/fpsyg-08-01027-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验