Health Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Health Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018 Jun;10(2):329-342. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9299-1.
Although several studies have evaluated the effect of synbiotic intake on metabolic profiles in patients with diabetes, findings are inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to summarize the evidence on the effect of synbiotic intake on metabolic profiles in patients with diabetes. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. All RCTs published up to 12 November 2016 were included. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias of included studies. Heterogeneity was measured with a Q test and with I statistics. Data were pooled by using the fix or random-effect model based on the heterogeneity test results and expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of seven randomized controlled trials were included. Synbiotic consumption significantly changed glucose metabolism, including fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SMD = -0.29; 95% CI, -0.47, -0.10), insulin concentrations (SMD = -0.84; 95% CI, -1.61, -0.06), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD = -0.80; 95% CI, -1.58, -0.03), homeostatic model assessment-B cell function (HOMA-B) (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.71, -0.01), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) (SMD = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.09, 0.82), and significantly improved lipid profiles, such as triglycerides (SMD = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.55, -0.17), very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (SMD = -0.31; 95% CI, -0.55, -0.08), and total cholesterol (SMD = -0.32; 95% CI, -0.67, -0.03), but had no effect on low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (SMD = -0.07; 95% CI, -0.58, 0.43) and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations (SMD = -0.25; 95% CI, -0.81, 0.31). Synbiotic may result in an improvement in FPG, insulin, HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, QUICKI, triglycerides, and total cholesterol.
尽管有几项研究评估了共生元摄入对糖尿病患者代谢谱的影响,但研究结果并不一致。本系统评价和荟萃分析对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了综述,以总结共生元摄入对糖尿病患者代谢谱影响的证据。系统检索了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库。纳入了截至 2016 年 11 月 12 日发表的所有 RCT。两名综述作者独立评估了研究的合格性、提取数据,并评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用 Q 检验和 I ² 统计量测量异质性。根据异质性检验结果,采用固定或随机效应模型对数据进行合并,并表示为标准化均数差(SMD)及 95%置信区间(CI)。共纳入 7 项 RCT。共生元的消耗显著改变了葡萄糖代谢,包括空腹血糖(FPG)(SMD = -0.29;95%CI,-0.47,-0.10)、胰岛素浓度(SMD = -0.84;95%CI,-1.61,-0.06)、稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)(SMD = -0.80;95%CI,-1.58,-0.03)、稳态模型评估的胰岛β细胞功能(HOMA-B)(SMD = -0.36;95%CI,-0.71,-0.01)、定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)(SMD = 0.46;95%CI,0.09,0.82),并显著改善了血脂谱,如甘油三酯(SMD = -0.36;95%CI,-0.55,-0.17)、极低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(SMD = -0.31;95%CI,-0.55,-0.08)和总胆固醇(SMD = -0.32;95%CI,-0.67,-0.03),但对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(SMD = -0.07;95%CI,-0.58,0.43)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度(SMD = -0.25;95%CI,-0.81,0.31)没有影响。共生元可能导致 FPG、胰岛素、HOMA-IR、HOMA-B、QUICKI、甘油三酯和总胆固醇的改善。