• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索教师发展者的经历,以增进我们对教师发展能力的理解。

Exploring Faculty Developers' Experiences to Inform Our Understanding of Competence in Faculty Development.

作者信息

Baker Lindsay, Leslie Karen, Panisko Danny, Walsh Allyn, Wong Anne, Stubbs Barbara, Mylopoulos Maria

机构信息

L. Baker is assistant professor, Department of Psychiatry, scientist, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, and lead educator-researcher, Centre for Faculty Development, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. K. Leslie is director, Centre for Faculty Development, and professor, Department of Pediatrics, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. D. Panisko is undergraduate medical education director, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. A. Walsh is professor, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. A. Wong is professor, Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. B. Stubbs is program director, Professional Development Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. M. Mylopoulos is associate professor and scientist, Wilson Centre and Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2018 Feb;93(2):265-273. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001821.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001821
PMID:28678104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5794230/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Now a mainstay in medical education, faculty development has created the role of the faculty developer. However, faculty development research tends to overlook faculty developers' roles and experiences. This study aimed to develop an empirical understanding of faculty developer competence by digging deeper into the actions, experiences, and perceptions of faculty developers as they perform their facilitator role.

METHOD

A constructivist grounded theory approach guided observations of faculty development activities, field interviews, and formal interviews with 31 faculty developers across two academic institutions from 2013 to 2014. Analysis occurred alongside and informed data collection. Themes were identified using a constant comparison process.

RESULTS

Consistent with the literature, findings highlighted the knowledge and skills of the faculty developer and the importance of context in the design and delivery of faculty development activities. Three novel processes (negotiating, constructing, and attuning) were identified that integrate the individual faculty developer, her context, and the evolution of her competence.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that faculty developer competence is best understood as a situated construct. A faculty developer's ability to attune to, construct, and negotiate her environment can both enhance and minimize the impact of contextual variables as needed. Thus, faculty developers do not passively experience context; rather, they actively interact with their environment in ways that maximize their performance. Faculty developers should be trained for the adaptive, situated use of knowledge.

摘要

目的

教师发展如今已成为医学教育的一项主要内容,催生了教师发展促进者这一角色。然而,教师发展研究往往忽视了教师发展促进者的角色和经历。本研究旨在通过更深入地探究教师发展促进者在履行其促进者角色时的行为、经历和认知,来实证性地理解教师发展促进者的能力。

方法

采用建构主义扎根理论方法,于2013年至2014年对两所学术机构的31名教师发展促进者的教师发展活动进行观察、进行实地访谈和正式访谈。分析与数据收集同步进行,并为数据收集提供信息。通过持续比较过程确定主题。

结果

与文献一致,研究结果突出了教师发展促进者的知识和技能,以及情境在教师发展活动设计和实施中的重要性。确定了三个新的过程(协商、建构和调适),这些过程整合了个体教师发展促进者、其情境以及其能力的演变。

结论

这些研究结果表明,教师发展促进者的能力最好被理解为一种情境性建构。教师发展促进者调适、建构和协商其环境的能力既能根据需要增强情境变量的影响,也能将其影响最小化。因此,教师发展促进者并非被动地体验情境;相反,他们以最大化自身表现的方式积极地与环境互动。教师发展促进者应接受培训,以便适应性地、情境性地运用知识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe76/5794230/cc1e7d2a25e4/acm-93-265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe76/5794230/cc1e7d2a25e4/acm-93-265-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe76/5794230/cc1e7d2a25e4/acm-93-265-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Faculty Developers' Experiences to Inform Our Understanding of Competence in Faculty Development.探索教师发展者的经历,以增进我们对教师发展能力的理解。
Acad Med. 2018 Feb;93(2):265-273. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001821.
2
Identity formation of occasional faculty developers in medical education: a qualitative study.医学教育中临时教师发展者的身份形成:一项定性研究。
Acad Med. 2014 Nov;89(11):1467-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000374.
3
What motivates occasional faculty developers to lead faculty development workshops? A qualitative study.是什么促使临时教师发展人员主持教师发展工作坊?一项定性研究。
Acad Med. 2015 Nov;90(11):1536-40. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000767.
4
Understanding the dimensions of a strong-professional identity: a study of faculty developers in medical education.理解强烈专业认同感的维度:医学教育领域教师发展者研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1808369. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1808369.
5
Implications for faculty development for emerging clinical teachers at distributed sites: a qualitative interpretivist study.分布式站点新兴临床教师的师资发展启示:一项质性解释主义研究
Rural Remote Health. 2018 May;18(2):4482. doi: 10.22605/RRH4482. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Frontline learning of medical teaching: "you pick up as you go through work and practice".医学教学的一线学习:“边工作边实践,边学习”。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1011-3.
7
Evolving from Didactic to Dialogic: How to Improve Faculty Development and Support Faculty Developers by Using Action Research.从说教式到对话式的转变:如何通过行动研究来改善教师发展并为教师发展者提供支持。
Teach Learn Med. 2024 Apr-May;36(2):211-221. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2023.2204091. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
8
Identity formation and motivation of new faculty developers: A replication study in a resource constrained university.新教师发展者的身份认同形成与动机:在资源受限大学中的一项重复研究。
Med Teach. 2016 Sep;38(9):879-85. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1132409. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
9
Aligning Education With Health Care Transformation: Identifying a Shared Mental Model of "New" Faculty Competencies for Academic Faculty.使教育与医疗保健转型保持一致:确定学术教师“新”能力的共享心智模式。
Acad Med. 2018 Feb;93(2):256-264. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001895.
10
Creating a Cadre of Fellowship-Trained Medical Educators: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Development Program Leaders' Perspectives and Advice.培养医学教育研究员队伍:对师资发展项目负责人的观点和建议进行的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2016 Dec;91(12):1696-1704. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001097.

引用本文的文献

1
Six ways to get a grip on recruiting "Occasional Faculty Developers".掌控“临时教师发展人员”招聘的六种方法。
Can Med Educ J. 2025 Feb 28;16(1):100-102. doi: 10.36834/cmej.79462. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Exploring the culture of faculty development: insights from Canadian leaders of faculty development.探索教师发展文化:来自加拿大教师发展领导者的见解。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Sep 8;14(4):15-24. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75752. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Challenges and solutions for the promotion of medical sciences faculty members in Iran: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education?为未来学习做准备:医学职业教育中的缺失能力?
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):115-23. doi: 10.1111/medu.12893.
2
Conceptual and practical challenges in the assessment of physician competencies.医生能力评估中的概念性和实际挑战。
Med Teach. 2015 Mar;37(3):245-51. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.993599. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
3
Integrating competencies.整合能力。
伊朗促进医学科学教师发展的挑战与对策:系统评价
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 26;22(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03451-2.
4
Organizational impact of faculty development programs on the medical teacher's competencies.教师发展项目对医学教师能力的组织影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Nov 30;10:430. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_122_21. eCollection 2021.
5
The COVID-19 pandemic and nurses' attitudes toward death.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行与护士对死亡的态度。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jul 19;29:e3448. doi: 10.1590/1518.8345.4769.3448. eCollection 2021.
6
Managerial competences of researchers from Nursing research groups.护理研究小组研究人员的管理能力。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jul 19;29:e3445. doi: 10.1590/1518.8345.4535.3445. eCollection 2021.
7
Understanding the dimensions of a strong-professional identity: a study of faculty developers in medical education.理解强烈专业认同感的维度:医学教育领域教师发展者研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1808369. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1808369.
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1049-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829ab5c8.
4
Advancing faculty development in medical education: a systematic review.推进医学教育中的教师发展:系统评价。
Acad Med. 2013 Jul;88(7):1038-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd29.
5
Renowned physicians' perceptions of expert diagnostic practice.著名医生对专家诊断实践的看法。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1413-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826735fc.
6
Perspective: Toward a competency framework for faculty.观点:构建教师能力框架
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10):1204-10. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822bd524.
7
"Teaching as a Competency": competencies for medical educators.“教学能力”:医学教育者的能力。
Acad Med. 2011 Oct;86(10):1211-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822c5b9a.
8
Putting the expert together again.重新聚集专家。
Med Educ. 2011 Sep;45(9):920-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04032.x.
9
The impact of selected contextual factors on experts' clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?).所选情境因素对专家临床推理表现的影响(情境是否会影响专家的临床推理表现?)
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):65-79. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9294-3. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
10
Reframing research on faculty development.重新构建教师发展研究。
Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):421-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058.