Hammers Hans J, Plimack Elizabeth R, Infante Jeffrey R, Rini Brian I, McDermott David F, Lewis Lionel D, Voss Martin H, Sharma Padmanee, Pal Sumanta K, Razak Albiruni R Abdul, Kollmannsberger Christian, Heng Daniel Y C, Spratlin Jennifer, McHenry M Brent, Amin Asim
Hans J. Hammers, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Elizabeth R. Plimack, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Jeffrey R. Infante, Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; Brian I. Rini, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Lionel D. Lewis, The Geisel School of Medicine and The Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Martin H. Voss, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Padmanee Sharma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX; Sumanta K. Pal, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario; Christian Kollmannsberger, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia; Daniel Y.C. Heng, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary; Jennifer Spratlin, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; M. Brent McHenry, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ; and Asim Amin, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3851-3858. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1985. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Purpose Combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown enhanced antitumor activity compared with monotherapy in tumor types such as melanoma. The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in combination, and nivolumab plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Safety and efficacy results from the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arms of the study are presented. Patients and Methods Patients with mRCC received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (N3I1), nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (N1I3), or nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (N3I3) every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until progression or toxicity. End points included safety (primary), objective response rate, and overall survival (OS). Results All patients in the N3I3 arm (n = 6) were censored at the time of analysis as a result of dose-limiting toxicity or other reasons. Forty-seven patients were treated in both the N3I1 and the N1I3 arm, and baseline patient characteristics were balanced between arms. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 38.3% and 61.7% of the patients in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. At a median follow-up of 22.3 months, the confirmed objective response rate was 40.4% in both arms, with ongoing responses in 42.1% and 36.8% of patients in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. The 2-year OS was 67.3% and 69.6% in the N3I1 and N1I3 arms, respectively. Conclusion Nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy demonstrated manageable safety, notable antitumor activity, and durable responses with promising OS in patients with mRCC.
目的 在黑色素瘤等肿瘤类型中,与单一疗法相比,免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗已显示出增强的抗肿瘤活性。开放标签、平行队列、剂量递增的I期CheckMate 016研究评估了纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗以及纳武利尤单抗联合酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)中的疗效和安全性。本文介绍了该研究中纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗组的安全性和疗效结果。患者与方法 mRCC患者接受静脉注射纳武利尤单抗3 mg/kg加伊匹木单抗1 mg/kg(N3I1)、纳武利尤单抗1 mg/kg加伊匹木单抗3 mg/kg(N1I3)或纳武利尤单抗3 mg/kg加伊匹木单抗3 mg/kg(N3I3),每3周给药一次,共4剂,随后每2周给予纳武利尤单抗单药治疗3 mg/kg,直至疾病进展或出现毒性反应。终点包括安全性(主要终点)、客观缓解率和总生存期(OS)。结果 由于剂量限制性毒性或其他原因,N3I3治疗组的所有患者(n = 6)在分析时均被 censored(此处原文未明确该词准确含义,暂保留英文)。N3I1和N1I3治疗组各有47例患者接受治疗,两组患者的基线特征均衡。N3I1和N1I3治疗组分别有38.3%和61.7%的患者报告了3 - 4级治疗相关不良事件。在中位随访22.3个月时,两组的确认客观缓解率均为40.4%,N3I1和N1I3治疗组分别有42.1%和36.8%的患者仍有持续缓解。N3I1和N1I3治疗组的2年总生存率分别为67.3%和69.6%。结论 纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗在mRCC患者中显示出可控的安全性、显著的抗肿瘤活性和持久的缓解效果,总生存期前景良好。