Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Center for Patient Safety Research and Practice, Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Dec;26(12):949-957. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006224. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Handoff communication errors are a leading source of sentinel events. We sought to determine the impact of a handoff improvement programme for nurses.
We conducted a prospective pre-post intervention study on a paediatric intensive care unit in 2011-2012. The I-PASS Nursing Handoff Bundle intervention consisted of educational training, verbal handoff I-PASS mnemonic implementation, and visual materials to provide reinforcement and sustainability. We developed handoff direct observation and time motion workflow assessment tools to measure: (1) quality of the verbal handoff, including interruption frequency and presence of key handoff data elements; and (2) duration of handoff and other workflow activities.
I-PASS implementation was associated with improvements in verbal handoff communications, including inclusion of illness severity assessment (37% preintervention vs 67% postintervention, p=0.001), patient summary (81% vs 95%, p=0.05), to do list (35% vs 100%, p<0.001) and an opportunity for the receiving nurse to ask questions (34% vs 73%, p<0.001). Overall, 13/21 (62%) of verbal handoff data elements were more likely to be present following implementation whereas no data elements were less likely present. Implementation was associated with a decrease in interruption frequency pre versus post intervention (67% vs 40% of handoffs with interruptions, p=0.005) without a change in the median handoff duration (18.8 min vs 19.9 min, p=0.48) or changes in time spent in direct or indirect patient care activities.
Implementation of the I-PASS Nursing Handoff Bundle was associated with widespread improvements in the verbal handoff process without a negative impact on nursing workflow. Implementation of I-PASS for nurses may therefore have the potential to significantly reduce medical errors and improve patient safety.
交接班沟通失误是导致警戒事件发生的主要原因之一。我们旨在确定一项护士交接班改进方案的效果。
我们于 2011-2012 年在一家儿科重症监护病房进行了一项前瞻性干预前后研究。I-PASS 护理交接班包干预包括教育培训、口头 I-PASS 交班记忆口诀的实施以及提供强化和可持续性的视觉材料。我们开发了交接班直接观察和时间动作工作流程评估工具,以衡量:(1)口头交接班的质量,包括中断的频率和关键交接班数据要素的存在情况;以及(2)交接班和其他工作流程活动的持续时间。
I-PASS 的实施与口头交接班沟通的改善相关,包括纳入疾病严重程度评估(干预前 37%,干预后 67%,p=0.001)、患者总结(干预前 81%,干预后 95%,p=0.05)、待办事项清单(干预前 35%,干预后 100%,p<0.001)和接受护士提问的机会(干预前 34%,干预后 73%,p<0.001)。总体而言,实施后口头交接班数据要素中有 13/21(62%)更有可能存在,而没有任何数据要素更不可能存在。实施后与实施前相比,中断频率降低(有中断的交接班中,干预前 67%,干预后 40%,p=0.005),而交接班持续时间中位数没有变化(18.8 分钟对 19.9 分钟,p=0.48)或直接或间接患者护理活动的时间也没有变化。
I-PASS 护理交接班包的实施与口头交接班过程的广泛改善相关,而对护理工作流程没有负面影响。因此,实施护士 I-PASS 可能具有显著降低医疗差错和提高患者安全性的潜力。