Lima-Oliveira Gabriel, Cesare Guidi Gian, Guimaraes Andre Valpassos Pacifici, Abol Correa Jose, Lippi Giuseppe
Section of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences - University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
DICQ - National System of Accreditation, Brazilian Society of Clinical Analyses, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Med Biochem. 2017 Jan 25;36(1):39-43. doi: 10.1515/jomb-2016-0032. eCollection 2017 Jan.
The multifaceted clinical laboratory process is divided in three essential phases: the preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical phase. Problems emerging from the preanalytical phase are responsible for more than 60% of laboratory errors. This report is aimed at highlighting and discussing nonconformity (e.g., nonstandardized procedures) in primary blood tube mixing immediately after blood collection by venipuncture with evacuated tube systems.
From January 2015 to December 2015, fifty different laboratory quality managers from Brazil were contacted to request their internal audit reports on nonconformity regarding primary blood tube mixing immediately after blood collection by venipuncture performed using evacuated tube systems.
A minority of internal audits (i.e., 4%) concluded that evacuated blood tubes were not accurately mixed after collection, whereas more than half of them reported that evacuated blood tubes were vigorously mixed immediately after collection, thus magnifying the risk of producing spurious hemolysis. Despite the vast ma jority of centers declaring that evacuated blood tubes were mixed gently and carefully, the overall number of inversions was found to be different from that recommended by the manufacturer. Since the turbulence generated by the standard vacuum pressure inside the primary evacuated tubes seems to be sufficient for providing solubilization, mixing and stabilization between additives and blood during venipuncture, avoidance of primary tube mixing probably does not introduce a major bias in tests results and may not be considered a nonconformity during audits for accreditation.
多层面的临床检验过程分为三个基本阶段:分析前阶段、分析阶段和分析后阶段。分析前阶段出现的问题导致了超过60%的检验误差。本报告旨在突出并讨论在使用真空采血管系统经静脉穿刺采血后立即进行的一次性采血管混匀操作中的不符合项(如程序未标准化)。
在2015年1月至2015年12月期间,联系了来自巴西的50位不同的实验室质量管理人员,索要他们关于使用真空采血管系统经静脉穿刺采血后立即进行的一次性采血管混匀操作不符合项的内部审核报告。
少数内部审核(即4%)得出结论,采血管在采血后未准确混匀,而超过半数的审核报告称采血管在采血后立即被大力混匀,从而增加了产生假性溶血的风险。尽管绝大多数中心宣称采血管被轻柔小心地混匀,但发现总的颠倒次数与制造商推荐的不同。由于一次性真空采血管内标准真空压力产生的湍流似乎足以在静脉穿刺期间使添加剂与血液之间实现溶解、混合和稳定,避免一次性采血管混匀可能不会在检测结果中引入重大偏差,并且在认可审核期间可能不被视为不符合项。