• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声洁治和口腔内抛光后金属合金和高强度陶瓷的表面变化。

Surface changes of metal alloys and high-strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing.

作者信息

Yoon Hyung-In, Noh Hyo-Mi, Park Eun-Jin

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Clinical Oral Health Science Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):188-194. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.188. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.188
PMID:28680550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5483405/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was to evaluate the effect of repeated ultrasonic scaling and surface polishing with intraoral polishing kits on the surface roughness of three different restorative materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 15 identical discs were fabricated with three different materials. The ultrasonic scaling was conducted for 20 seconds on the test surfaces. Subsequently, a multi-step polishing with recommended intraoral polishing kit was performed for 30 seconds. The 3D profiler and scanning electron microscopy were used to investigate surface integrity before scaling (pristine), after scaling, and after surface polishing for each material. Non-parametric Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests were employed to statistically evaluate surface roughness changes of the pristine, scaled, and polished specimens. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

Surface roughness values before scaling (pristine), after scaling, and polishing of the metal alloys were 3.02±0.34 µm, 2.44±0.72 µm, and 3.49±0.72 µm, respectively. Surface roughness of lithium disilicate increased from 2.35±1.05 µm (pristine) to 28.54±9.64 µm (scaling), and further increased after polishing (56.66±9.12 µm, <.05). The zirconia showed the most increase in roughness after scaling (from 1.65±0.42 µm to 101.37±18.75 µm), while its surface roughness decreased after polishing (29.57±18.86 µm, <.05).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonic scaling significantly changed the surface integrities of lithium disilicate and zirconia. Surface polishing with multi-step intraoral kit after repeated scaling was only effective for the zirconia, while it was not for lithium disilicate.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用口腔内抛光套件进行反复超声洁治和表面抛光对三种不同修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。

材料与方法

用三种不同材料制作了总共15个相同的圆盘。在测试表面进行20秒的超声洁治。随后,使用推荐的口腔内抛光套件进行30秒的多步抛光。使用三维轮廓仪和扫描电子显微镜研究每种材料在洁治前(原始状态)、洁治后和表面抛光后的表面完整性。采用非参数Friedman检验和Wilcoxon符号秩和检验对原始、洁治和抛光标本的表面粗糙度变化进行统计学评估。显著性水平设定为0.05。

结果

金属合金在洁治前(原始状态)、洁治后和抛光后的表面粗糙度值分别为3.02±0.34 µm、2.44±0.72 µm和3.49±0.72 µm。二硅酸锂的表面粗糙度从2.35±1.05 µm(原始状态)增加到28.54±9.64 µm(洁治后),抛光后进一步增加(56.66±9.12 µm,P<0.05)。氧化锆在洁治后粗糙度增加最多(从1.65±0.42 µm增加到101.37±18.75 µm),而抛光后其表面粗糙度降低(29.57±18.86 µm,P<0.05)。

结论

超声洁治显著改变了二硅酸锂和氧化锆的表面完整性。反复洁治后使用多步口腔内套件进行表面抛光仅对氧化锆有效,而对二硅酸锂无效。

相似文献

1
Surface changes of metal alloys and high-strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing.超声洁治和口腔内抛光后金属合金和高强度陶瓷的表面变化。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):188-194. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.188. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.两种洁牙器械对氧化铝、氧化锆和锂硅玻璃陶瓷表面粗糙度的体外评价。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):129-135. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12424. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
3
Effect of Two Different Intraoral Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Color Stability, and Bacterial Accumulation of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic.两种不同口内抛光系统对氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷表面粗糙度、颜色稳定性和细菌积聚的影响
Eur J Dent. 2024 Oct;18(4):1069-1075. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779423. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
4
The Effect of Aging on the Roughness and Bacterial Adhesion of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Ceramics.老化对锂硅和氧化锆陶瓷粗糙度及细菌黏附的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2021 Jun;30(5):440-446. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13257. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.两种抛光系统对整体式二硅酸锂陶瓷表面粗糙度、形貌和弯曲强度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e172-e180. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12586. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
6
Experimental Study of Surface Roughness of Dental Ceramics After Polishing with Three Types of Polishing Systems.三种抛光系统对牙科陶瓷抛光后表面粗糙度的实验研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Oct 31;12(5):540-546. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_107_22. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
7
Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface roughness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia.粗磨、上釉和 2 种抛光系统对钇稳定四方氧化锆的弯曲强度、表面粗糙度和相转变的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Nov;118(5):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
8
An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.常见固定义齿修复材料中洁治引起的表面粗糙度对细菌黏附影响的研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 13.
9
The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia.抛光套件的有效性:对氧化锆表面粗糙度的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):149-51. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4153.
10
Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation.牙科调整治疗及体外磨损模拟后整体式氧化锆的表面特性
J Dent. 2015 Jan;43(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.011. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Different Scaling Methods on the Surface Topography of Different CAD/CAM Ceramic Compositions.不同打磨方法对不同CAD/CAM陶瓷成分表面形貌的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 8;16(8):2974. doi: 10.3390/ma16082974.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness of Four Ceramic Materials after Occlusal Adjustment.四陶瓷材料经咬合调整后的表面粗糙度的修整和抛光效果。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Nov 12;28(6):382-396. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12222. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
2
An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.两种洁牙器械对氧化铝、氧化锆和锂硅玻璃陶瓷表面粗糙度的体外评价。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Feb;26(2):129-135. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12424. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
3
Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Ceramic and Resin Composite Material Used for Conservative Indirect Restorations, after Repolishing by Intraoral Means.
评价经口腔内再抛光后用于保守性间接修复的陶瓷和树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;26(4):296-301. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12390. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia.抛光套件的有效性:对氧化锆表面粗糙度的影响。
Int J Prosthodont. 2015 Mar-Apr;28(2):149-51. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4153.
5
The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces.压电超声洁治器的器械操作角度对牙根表面的影响。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2016 Aug;14(3):184-90. doi: 10.1111/idh.12134. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
Effect of polishing and finishing procedures on the surface integrity of restorative ceramics.抛光和修整工艺对修复性陶瓷表面完整性的影响。
Am J Dent. 2013 Feb;26(1):51-5.
7
Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.不同修复材料的表面处理技术对表面粗糙度和细菌黏附的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Apr;103(4):221-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60034-0.
8
Characterization of glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramics.玻璃渗透氧化铝基陶瓷的表征
Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
9
Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review.具有临床推荐的当前陶瓷材料和系统:一项系统综述。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Nov;98(5):389-404. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3.
10
Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains.烤瓷牙釉面和抛光面的颜色稳定性。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Jan;17(1):20-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00237.x. Epub 2007 Oct 30.