Syndicus Marc, Wiese Bettina S, van Treeck Christoph
a Personnel and Organizational Psychology , RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany.
b Institute of Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Building E3D , RWTH Aachen University , Aachen , Germany.
Ergonomics. 2018 Apr;61(4):476-481. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1353141. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
We investigated the effect of an elevated ambient temperature on performance in a persistence task. The task involved the coding of incorrect symbols and participants were free to decide how long to spend performing this task. Applying a between-subject design, we tested 125 students in an office-like environment in one of the three temperature conditions. The comfort condition (Predicted Mean Vote [PMV] = 0.01) featured an average air temperature of 24 °C. The elevated ambient temperature condition was 28 °C (PMV = 1.17). Condition three employed an airstream of approximately 0.8 m/s, intended to compensate for performance decrements at the elevated air temperature (28 °C, PMV = 0.13), according to Fanger's thermal comfort equation. Participants in the warm condition were significantly less persistent compared with participants in the control and compensation conditions. As predicted by the thermal comfort equation, the airstream seemed to compensate for the higher temperature. Participants' persistence in the compensation and comfort conditions did not differ. Practitioner Summary: A laboratory experiment involving a simulated office environment and three ambient temperature conditions (24 °C, 28 °C and 28 °C plus airstream) showed that persistence at a task is significantly impaired at 28 °C. An airstream of 0.8 m/s at 28 °C compensated for the disinclination to persist with the task.
我们研究了环境温度升高对一项持续性任务表现的影响。该任务涉及对错误符号进行编码,参与者可自行决定执行此任务的时长。采用组间设计,我们在类似办公室的环境中,于三种温度条件之一对125名学生进行了测试。舒适条件(预测平均投票值[PMV]=0.01)的平均气温为24°C。环境温度升高条件为28°C(PMV = 1.17)。根据范格热舒适方程,第三种条件采用了约0.8米/秒的气流,旨在补偿在升高的气温(28°C,PMV = 0.13)下的表现下降。与对照组和补偿组的参与者相比,处于温暖条件下的参与者持续性显著降低。正如热舒适方程所预测的,气流似乎补偿了较高的温度。补偿组和舒适组参与者的持续性没有差异。从业者总结:一项涉及模拟办公室环境和三种环境温度条件(24°C、28°C以及28°C加气流)的实验室实验表明,在28°C时任务的持续性会显著受损。28°C时0.8米/秒的气流补偿了不愿持续执行任务的倾向。