Suppr超能文献

对定性综合的更高要求:对萨莉·索恩的回应。

Asking More of Qualitative Synthesis: A Response to Sally Thorne.

机构信息

1 University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.

2 University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2017 Jul;27(9):1370-1376. doi: 10.1177/1049732317709010. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

We continue the conversation initiated by Sally Thorne's observations about "metasynthetic madness." We note that the variety of labels used to describe qualitative syntheses often reflect authors' disciplines and geographical locations. The purpose of systematic literature searching is to redress authors' lack of citation of relevant earlier work and to reassure policy makers that qualitative syntheses are systematic and transparent. There is clearly a need to develop other methods of searching to supplement electronic searches. If searches produce large numbers of articles, sampling strategies may be needed to choose which articles to synthesize. The quality of any synthesis is dependent on the quality of the primary articles; both primary research and qualitative synthesis need to move beyond description and toward theory and explanation. Synthesizers need to pay attention to those articles which do not seem to fit their emerging analysis if they are to avoid stifling new ideas.

摘要

我们继续萨莉·索恩(Sally Thorne)关于“综合狂想症”的观察所引发的讨论。我们注意到,用于描述定性综合的各种标签通常反映了作者的学科和地理位置。系统文献检索的目的是纠正作者对相关早期工作引用不足的问题,并向决策者保证定性综合是系统和透明的。显然需要开发其他搜索方法来补充电子搜索。如果搜索产生了大量文章,则可能需要抽样策略来选择要综合的文章。任何综合的质量都取决于原始文章的质量;原始研究和定性综合都需要从描述走向理论和解释。综合者需要注意那些似乎不符合他们正在进行的分析的文章,以免扼杀新的想法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验