• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.快速综述方法系列:快速定性证据综合指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.快速定性证据综合:应对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01512-5.
4
The conduct and reporting of qualitative evidence syntheses in health and social care guidelines: a content analysis.卫生和社会保健指南中定性证据综合的实施和报告:内容分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01743-1.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) for Guidelines: Paper 2 - Using qualitative evidence synthesis findings to inform evidence-to-decision frameworks and recommendations.定性证据综合(QES)在指南中的应用:第 2 篇 - 使用定性证据综合研究结果来为证据决策框架和建议提供信息。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 8;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0468-4.
7
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估-第 3 部分:如何评估方法学局限性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0690-9.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings.考克兰定性和实施方法组指南系列论文 3:评估方法学局限性、数据提取和综合以及对综合定性发现的信心的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
[Introduction to qualitative evidence synthesis - Variants and application].[定性证据综合的介绍——变体与应用]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024 Aug;63(4):238-246. doi: 10.1055/a-2263-1270. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing the allied health professionals workforce within mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient services: rapid review of learning from quality and safety incidents.在精神健康、学习障碍和自闭症住院服务领域培养联合健康专业人员队伍:对质量与安全事件经验教训的快速回顾
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 May 19;34(6):389-403. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017746.

本文引用的文献

1
Opportunities and challenges in involving people with lived experience of inclusion health as co-researchers in palliative and end of life research: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.将有包容性健康生活经历的人纳入姑息治疗和临终研究共同研究者的机遇与挑战:快速回顾与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 20;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00436-3.
2
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search.快速综述方法系列:文献检索指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):412-417. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079.
3
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.快速综述方法系列:团队考虑因素、研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):418-423. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185.
4
Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users.快速评论方法系列:将患者和公众合作伙伴、医疗保健提供者和政策制定者作为知识使用者纳入其中。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):55-61. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070.
5
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.快速综述方法系列:评估证据确定性指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):50-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111.
6
The move towards living systematic reviews and living guidelines in healthcare: consideration of the possibilities and challenges for living qualitative evidence syntheses.迈向医疗保健中系统评价和指南的实时化:对实时化定性证据综合的可能性和挑战的思考。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 16;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02218-0.
7
Implementation considerations for non-communicable disease-related integration in primary health care: a rapid review of qualitative evidence.非传染性疾病相关整合在初级卫生保健中的实施考虑因素:定性证据的快速综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 18;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09151-x.
8
Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.优先级 III:使用詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系确定的前 10 项快速审查方法学研究优先事项。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
9
Social distancing measures: barriers to their implementation and how they can be overcome - a systematic review.社交距离措施:实施的障碍及克服方法——系统综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Dec 1;31(6):1249-1258. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab103.
10
A QuESt for speed: rapid qualitative evidence syntheses as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.快速定性证据综合:应对 COVID-19 大流行的快速反应。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01512-5.

快速综述方法系列:快速定性证据综合指南。

Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.

机构信息

EnSyGN Sheffield Evidence Synthesis Group, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group (CQIMG), London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620.

DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620
PMID:38355285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11137447/
Abstract

This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of qualitative research. 'Rapid' or 'resource-constrained' QES require use of templates and targeted knowledge user involvement. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Thematic and framework synthesis facilitate efficient synthesis of large numbers of studies or plentiful data. Finally, judicious use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product.

摘要

本文是 Cochrane 快速评论方法组一系列方法指南的一部分,涉及快速定性证据综合(QES),当面临资源限制时,使用经过修改的系统、透明和可重复的方法来加速定性证据的综合。本指南涵盖了与定性研究综合相关的审查过程。“快速”或“资源有限”的 QES 需要使用模板和有针对性的知识用户参与。明确界定观点和对间接证据、抽样和现有 QES 的使用的决策有助于确定资格标准。信息专家的参与,特别是在优先选择数据库、针对灰色文献和规划补充搜索方面,可以证明是非常宝贵的。在研究选择和数据提取中使用模板和框架,可以同时进行针对可能存在的弱点领域的质量保证程序。当前的 Cochrane 指南为质量评估工具和综合方法的选择提供信息。主题和框架综合有助于高效地综合大量研究或大量数据。最后,明智地使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach)对定性研究评估的证据进行评估,并根据需要使用软件,有助于及时生成有用的审查产品。