Suppr超能文献

快速综述方法系列:快速定性证据综合指南。

Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis.

机构信息

EnSyGN Sheffield Evidence Synthesis Group, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group (CQIMG), London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):194-200. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112620.

Abstract

This paper forms part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group and addresses rapid qualitative evidence syntheses (QESs), which use modified systematic, transparent and reproducible methodsu to accelerate the synthesis of qualitative evidence when faced with resource constraints. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of qualitative research. 'Rapid' or 'resource-constrained' QES require use of templates and targeted knowledge user involvement. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. Use of templates and frameworks in study selection and data extraction can be accompanied by quality assurance procedures targeting areas of likely weakness. Current Cochrane guidance informs selection of tools for quality assessment and of synthesis method. Thematic and framework synthesis facilitate efficient synthesis of large numbers of studies or plentiful data. Finally, judicious use of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help to achieve a timely and useful review product.

摘要

本文是 Cochrane 快速评论方法组一系列方法指南的一部分,涉及快速定性证据综合(QES),当面临资源限制时,使用经过修改的系统、透明和可重复的方法来加速定性证据的综合。本指南涵盖了与定性研究综合相关的审查过程。“快速”或“资源有限”的 QES 需要使用模板和有针对性的知识用户参与。明确界定观点和对间接证据、抽样和现有 QES 的使用的决策有助于确定资格标准。信息专家的参与,特别是在优先选择数据库、针对灰色文献和规划补充搜索方面,可以证明是非常宝贵的。在研究选择和数据提取中使用模板和框架,可以同时进行针对可能存在的弱点领域的质量保证程序。当前的 Cochrane 指南为质量评估工具和综合方法的选择提供信息。主题和框架综合有助于高效地综合大量研究或大量数据。最后,明智地使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach)对定性研究评估的证据进行评估,并根据需要使用软件,有助于及时生成有用的审查产品。

相似文献

5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
[Introduction to qualitative evidence synthesis - Variants and application].[定性证据综合的介绍——变体与应用]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2024 Aug;63(4):238-246. doi: 10.1055/a-2263-1270. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

2
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search.快速综述方法系列:文献检索指南。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):412-417. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验