Lee Jeonghun, Park Sung Won, Kim You Sun, Lee Kyung Jin, Sung Hyun, Song Pil Hun, Yoon Won Jae, Moon Jeong Seop
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul Department of Internal Medicine, Ace Hospital, Ansan, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jul;96(27):e7468. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007468.
Several studies have reported a significant rate of missed colorectal polyps during colonoscopy. This study aimed to determine the variables that affect the miss rate of colorectal polyps.We performed a retrospective observational study of patients who, between January 2007 and December 2014, had undergone a second colonoscopy within 6 months of their first. In all patients, the first colonoscopy constituted a screening or surveillance colonoscopy as part of a health check-up, and the patients were referred to the endoscopic clinic if there were meaningful polyps. The miss rate of colorectal polyps was evaluated, as were the variables related to these missed lesions.Among 659 patients (535 men), the miss rate of colorectal polyps was 17.24% (372/2158 polyps), and 38.69% of patients (255/659 patients) had at least 1 missed polyp. The most common site for missed polyps was the ascending colon (29.8%), followed by the sigmoid colon (27.8%). The miss rate of polyps was higher in men [odds ratio (OR) = 1.611, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.024-2.536], patients with multiple polyps at their first colonoscopy (OR = 1.463, 95% CI = 0.992-2.157), and patients who had a history of polyps (OR = 23.783, 95% CI = 3.079-183.694). Multiple missed polyps were more frequently located in the right colon (OR = 2.605, 95% CI = 1.458-4.657), and the risk of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp was greater in the right colon (OR = 10.418, 95% CI = 2.073-52.353).Endoscopists should pay careful attention in patients who have multiple polyps and in those who have a history of polyps, because such patients are at a high risk of missed polyps in colonoscopy.
多项研究报告称,结肠镜检查期间大肠息肉漏诊率颇高。本研究旨在确定影响大肠息肉漏诊率的变量。我们对2007年1月至2014年12月期间在首次结肠镜检查后6个月内接受第二次结肠镜检查的患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。在所有患者中,首次结肠镜检查作为健康体检的一部分进行筛查或监测结肠镜检查,若发现有意义的息肉,则将患者转诊至内镜诊所。评估了大肠息肉的漏诊率以及与这些漏诊病变相关的变量。在659例患者(535例男性)中,大肠息肉漏诊率为17.24%(2158枚息肉中有372枚漏诊),38.69%的患者(659例患者中有255例)至少有1枚息肉漏诊。息肉漏诊最常见的部位是升结肠(29.8%),其次是乙状结肠(27.8%)。男性息肉漏诊率更高[比值比(OR)=1.611,95%置信区间(95%CI)=1.024 - 2.536],首次结肠镜检查时有多个息肉的患者(OR = 1.463,95%CI = 0.992 - 2.157),以及有息肉病史的患者(OR = 23.783,95%CI = 3.079 - 183.694)。多个漏诊息肉更常见于右半结肠(OR = 2.605,95%CI = 1.458 - 4.657),且无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉在右半结肠的风险更大(OR = 10.418,95%CI = 2.073 - 52.353)。内镜医师应对有多个息肉和有息肉病史的患者予以密切关注,因为这类患者在结肠镜检查时息肉漏诊风险较高。