• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较基于体重的胰岛素滴定 (WIT) 和基于血糖的胰岛素滴定在 2 型糖尿病住院患者中使用基础-餐时胰岛素输注方案:一项多中心、随机、临床研究。

Comparison of weight-based insulin titration (WIT) and glucose-based insulin titration using basal-bolus algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Endocrinology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001261.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001261
PMID:32933950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7493103/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Subcutaneous administration of insulin is the preferred method for achieving glucose control in non-critically ill patients with diabetes. Glucose-based titration protocols were widely applied in clinical practice. However, most of these algorithms are experience-based and there is considerable variability and complexity. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of a weight-based insulin titration algorithm versus glucose-based algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized clinical trial was carried out at four centers in the South, Central and North China. Inpatients with T2DM were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weight-based and glucose-based insulin titration algorithms. The primary outcome was the length of time for reaching blood glucose (BG) targets (fasting BG (FBG) and 2-hour postprandial BG (2hBG) after three meals). The secondary outcome included insulin dose for achieving glycemic control and the incidence of hypoglycemia during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Between January 2016 and June 2019, 780 patients were screened, and 575 completed the trial (283 in the weight-based group and 292 in the glucose-based group). The lengths of time for reaching BG targets at four time points were comparable between two groups. FBG reached targets within 3 days and 2hBG after three meals within 4 days. There is no significant difference in insulin doses between two groups at the end of the study. The total daily dosage was about 1 unit/kg/day, and the ratio of basal-to-bolus was about 2:3 in both groups. The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups, and severe hypoglycemia was not detected in either of the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight-based insulin titration algorithm is equally effective and safe in hospitalized patients with T2DM compared with glucose-based algorithm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03220919.

摘要

简介

在非危重症糖尿病患者中,皮下注射胰岛素是控制血糖的首选方法。基于血糖的滴定方案在临床实践中得到了广泛应用。然而,这些算法大多是基于经验的,存在相当大的变异性和复杂性。本研究旨在比较基于体重的胰岛素滴定算法与基于血糖的算法在住院 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的有效性和安全性。

研究设计和方法

这项随机临床试验在中国南方、中部和北部的四个中心进行。将 T2DM 住院患者按 1:1 随机分为接受基于体重和基于血糖的胰岛素滴定算法的两组。主要结局是达到血糖(BG)目标的时间(空腹 BG(FBG)和三餐后 2 小时 BG(2hBG))。次要结局包括达到血糖控制的胰岛素剂量和住院期间低血糖的发生率。

结果

2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月,共筛选出 780 例患者,其中 575 例完成了试验(体重组 283 例,血糖组 292 例)。两组在四个时间点达到 BG 目标的时间无显著差异。FBG 在 3 天内达到目标,三餐后 2hBG 在 4 天内达到目标。两组在研究结束时胰岛素剂量无显著差异。总的日剂量约为 1 单位/kg/天,两组基础-餐时胰岛素比例约为 2:3。两组低血糖发生率相似,均未发现严重低血糖。

结论

与基于血糖的算法相比,基于体重的胰岛素滴定算法在住院 T2DM 患者中同样有效且安全。

临床试验注册号

NCT03220919。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e81/7493103/16cb1e63a73b/bmjdrc-2020-001261f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e81/7493103/ece1f272a7b5/bmjdrc-2020-001261f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e81/7493103/16cb1e63a73b/bmjdrc-2020-001261f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e81/7493103/ece1f272a7b5/bmjdrc-2020-001261f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e81/7493103/16cb1e63a73b/bmjdrc-2020-001261f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of weight-based insulin titration (WIT) and glucose-based insulin titration using basal-bolus algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.比较基于体重的胰岛素滴定 (WIT) 和基于血糖的胰岛素滴定在 2 型糖尿病住院患者中使用基础-餐时胰岛素输注方案:一项多中心、随机、临床研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001261.
2
Efficacy and safety of basal-bolus insulin at 1:1.5 ratio compared to 1:1 ratio using a weight-based initiation and titration (WIT2) algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 Diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.在2型糖尿病住院患者中,使用基于体重的起始和滴定(WIT2)算法,比较1:1.5比例与1:1比例的基础-餐时胰岛素的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、临床研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Nov 27;15(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01193-9.
3
Dosing of insulin glargine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.甘精胰岛素在2型糖尿病治疗中的给药方法
Clin Ther. 2007 Jun;29(6):987-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.06.018.
4
Efficacy of a basal insulin dose management smartphone application for controlling fasting blood glucose in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus: A single-centre, randomised clinical study.一款基础胰岛素剂量管理智能手机应用控制 2 型糖尿病患者空腹血糖的疗效:一项单中心、随机临床试验。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2023 Oct;99(4):361-369. doi: 10.1111/cen.14956. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
5
Efficacy of basal-bolus insulin regimens in the inpatient management of non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基础-餐时胰岛素方案在非危重症2型糖尿病患者住院治疗中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 Jul;33(5). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2885. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
Comparison of an Electronic Glycemic Management System Versus Provider-Managed Subcutaneous Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in the Hospital Setting.医院环境中电子血糖管理系统与医护人员管理的皮下基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):12-16. doi: 10.1177/1932296816664746. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
7
Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine.改善血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平:两种使用甘精胰岛素治疗方案的比较
Diabetes Care. 2005 Jun;28(6):1282-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.6.1282.
8
Decreased rates of hypoglycemia following implementation of a comprehensive computerized insulin order set and titration algorithm in the inpatient setting.在住院环境中实施全面的计算机化胰岛素医嘱集和滴定算法后,低血糖发生率降低。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2016 Dec;44(5):260-265. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1250603. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
9
Effects of multiple daily injection therapy with Humalog mixtures versus separately injected insulin lispro and NPH insulin in adults with type I diabetes mellitus.优泌乐混合制剂每日多次注射疗法与分别注射赖脯胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素对1型糖尿病成年患者的疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2004 Apr;26(4):502-10. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(04)90052-5.
10
Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec U100 and insulin glargine U100 in combination with meal-time bolus insulin in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: an open-label, randomized controlled study.住院 2 型糖尿病患者中,德谷胰岛素 U100 和甘精胰岛素 U100 联合餐时胰岛素注射的疗效和安全性:一项开放标签、随机对照研究。
Endocr J. 2019 Nov 28;66(11):971-982. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ18-0309. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening and management of hospital hyperglycemia in non-critical patients: a position statement from the Brazilian Diabetes Society (SBD).非重症患者医院高血糖的筛查与管理:巴西糖尿病协会(SBD)的立场声明
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Feb 12;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01585-z.
2
Efficacy and safety of basal-bolus insulin at 1:1.5 ratio compared to 1:1 ratio using a weight-based initiation and titration (WIT2) algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 Diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.在2型糖尿病住院患者中,使用基于体重的起始和滴定(WIT2)算法,比较1:1.5比例与1:1比例的基础-餐时胰岛素的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、临床研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Nov 27;15(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01193-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S66-S76. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S006.
2
Bolus Insulin Prescribing Recommendations for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素推注处方建议
Fed Pract. 2017 Oct;34(Suppl 8):S26-S31.
3
Managing Diabetes in Patients Hospitalized in Internal Medicine Units.内科病房住院患者的糖尿病管理
Comparison of Prevailing Insulin Regimens at Different Time Periods in Hospitalized Patients: A Real-World Experience from a Tertiary Hospital.不同时期住院患者胰岛素治疗方案的比较:来自一家三级医院的真实世界经验。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 May;46(3):439-450. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0065. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2018 Apr 19;9(2):e0014. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10334.
4
Knowledge Translation to Optimize Adult Inpatient Glycemic Management With Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy and Improve Patient Outcomes.知识转化以优化成人住院患者基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的血糖管理并改善患者结局。
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Oct;42(5):505-513.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
Comparison of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine for Hospitalized Patients on a Basal-Bolus Protocol.德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素用于接受基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗的住院患者的比较。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Apr 23;5(2):22. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020022.
6
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GLARGINE AND DETEMIR INSULIN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INPATIENT HYPERGLYCEMIA AND DIABETES.甘精胰岛素与地特胰岛素治疗住院患者高血糖及糖尿病的疗效与安全性比较
Endocr Pract. 2017 Sep;23(9):1059-1066. doi: 10.4158/EP171804.OR. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
7
Management of Inpatient Hyperglycemia and Diabetes in Older Adults.老年住院患者高血糖和糖尿病的管理
Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):509-517. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0989.
8
Obesity pandemic: causes, consequences, and solutions-but do we have the will?肥胖症大流行:成因、后果及解决方案——但我们有意愿吗?
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):833-839. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.104. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
9
A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.一项关于速效胰岛素门冬氨酸在1型糖尿病成人患者中药代动力学和药效学特征的临床药理学试验的汇总分析。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 May;56(5):551-559. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8.
10
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial.地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素在2型糖尿病住院患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机交叉试验
Adv Ther. 2016 Feb;33(2):178-85. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0288-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.