School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity (SHARE) Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.035. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Many intimate partner homicide victims visit emergency departments (EDs) prior to their deaths, yet their lethality risk is not well understood. eHealth interventions for intimate partner violence (IPV) improve provider information, tailor care to victim need and link victims to services. We analyzed ED patients' lethality risk using one such intervention, Domestic Violence Report and Referral (DVRR). DVRR records were assessed for 263 female patients aged 16 and older seen for IPV at an urban, high-traffic, Northern California ED in 2014-15. Multiple linear regression was used to test the association of children's presence at home, pregnancy, age, and abuser-victim relationship with victim's lethality risk using the Danger Assessment (DA) score from the Lethality Risk Assessment for Intimate Partner Femicide. Differences in means were assessed using t- and F-tests. The mean DA score indicated high lethality risk, with a third of respondents (33.1%) reporting very high DA scores. Multiple linear regression models indicated that increasing victim age (β=0.20/year; 95% CI: 0.11-0.29), children's presence at home (β=2.61, 95% CI: 0.63-4.58), and perpetrator reported as dating partner (β=4.50, 95% CI: 1.62-7.38) or ex-partner (β=4.38, 95% CI: 1.10-7.66) were significantly associated with the DA score (p<0.05). Use of DA scores as ED risk assessment tools in response to IPV victimization could help hospital staff and IPV advocates direct resources toward highest-need patients, improving health outcomes without additional burden on hospitals. These results also foreground eHealth interventions' utility in linking providers and IPV advocates and reducing the risk of intimate partner homicide.
许多亲密伴侣凶杀案的受害者在死亡前曾前往急诊部(ED)就诊,但他们的致命风险尚不清楚。电子健康干预措施可改善服务提供者的信息,根据受害者的需求调整护理,并将受害者与服务联系起来。我们分析了一种这样的干预措施——家庭暴力报告和转介(DVRR),用于评估 ED 患者的致命风险。2014-15 年,在加利福尼亚州北部一个城市的高流量 ED 对 263 名年龄在 16 岁及以上因亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)就诊的女性患者的 DVRR 记录进行了评估。使用危险评估(DA)得分来测试家庭中孩子的存在、怀孕、年龄和施虐者-受害者关系与受害者的致命风险之间的关联,危险评估得分是亲密伴侣女性凶杀案的致命风险评估。使用 t 检验和 F 检验评估均值差异。DA 得分均值表明存在高致命风险,三分之一的受访者(33.1%)报告 DA 得分非常高。多元线性回归模型表明,受害者年龄增加(β=0.20/年;95%置信区间:0.11-0.29)、家庭中孩子的存在(β=2.61,95%置信区间:0.63-4.58)以及施虐者被报告为约会伴侣(β=4.50,95%置信区间:1.62-7.38)或前伴侣(β=4.38,95%置信区间:1.10-7.66)与 DA 得分显著相关(p<0.05)。在对 IPV 受害者使用 DA 得分作为 ED 风险评估工具,可以帮助医院工作人员和 IPV 倡导者将资源用于最需要的患者,改善健康结果,而不会给医院带来额外负担。这些结果还突出了电子健康干预措施在联系服务提供者和 IPV 倡导者以及降低亲密伴侣凶杀风险方面的效用。