Suppr超能文献

2021 年 SAEM 共识会议记录:制定急诊科社会风险和需求筛查工具的研究重点。

2021 SAEM Consensus Conference Proceedings: Research Priorities for Developing Emergency Department Screening Tools for Social Risks and Needs.

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Department of Emergency Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.

University of Washington, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 10;23(6):817-822. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.8.57271.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Emergency Department (ED) acts as a safety net for our healthcare system. While studies have shown increased prevalence of social risks and needs among ED patients, there are many outstanding questions about the validity and use of social risks and needs screening tools in the ED setting.

METHODS

In this paper, we present research gaps and priorities pertaining to social risks and needs screening tools used in the ED, identified through a consensus approach informed by literature review and external expert feedback as part of the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference -- From Bedside to Policy: Advancing Social Emergency Medicine and Population Health.

RESULTS

Four overarching research gaps were identified: (1) Defining the purpose and ethical implications of ED-based screening; (2) Identifying domains of social risks and needs; (3) Developing and validating screening tools; and (4) Defining the patient population and type of screening performed. Furthermore, the following research questions were determined to be of highest priority: (1) What screening tools should be used to identify social risks and needs? (2) Should individual EDs use a national standard screening tools or customized screening tools? (3) What are the most prevalent social risks and needs in the ED? and (4) Which social risks and needs are most amenable to intervention in the ED setting?

CONCLUSION

Answering these research questions will facilitate the use of evidence-based social risks and needs screening tools that address knowledge gaps and improve the health of our communities by better understanding the underlying determinants contributing to their presentation and health outcomes.

摘要

简介

急诊科(ED)是我们医疗保健系统的安全网。尽管研究表明,ED 患者的社会风险和需求日益增加,但关于 ED 环境中社会风险和需求筛查工具的有效性和使用仍存在许多悬而未决的问题。

方法

在本文中,我们通过文献回顾和外部专家反馈信息,采用共识方法确定了与 ED 中使用的社会风险和需求筛查工具相关的研究空白和优先事项,这些内容是 2021 年 SAEM 共识会议的一部分——从床边到政策:推进社会急诊医学和人口健康。

结果

确定了四个总体研究空白:(1)确定 ED 筛查的目的和伦理影响;(2)确定社会风险和需求领域;(3)开发和验证筛查工具;(4)定义患者人群和进行的筛查类型。此外,确定了以下优先研究问题:(1)应该使用哪些筛查工具来识别社会风险和需求?(2)各个 ED 是否应该使用国家标准筛查工具或定制化筛查工具?(3)ED 中最常见的社会风险和需求是什么?(4)ED 环境中哪些社会风险和需求最适合干预?

结论

回答这些研究问题将有助于使用基于证据的社会风险和需求筛查工具,这些工具可以解决知识空白,并通过更好地了解导致其出现和健康结果的潜在决定因素,改善我们社区的健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfc/9683763/a7d341428437/wjem-23-817-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验