Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Circ J. 2017 Nov 24;81(12):1894-1900. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0284. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
Myocardial bridges (MB) are commonly seen on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic individuals, but in patients with recurrent typical angina symptoms, yet no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), evaluation of their potential hemodynamic significance is clinically relevant. The aim of this study was to compare CCTA to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), to confirm MB morphology and estimate their functional significance in symptomatic patients.Methods and Results:We retrospectively identified 59 patients from our clinical databases between 2009 and 2014 in whom the suspicion for MB was raised by symptoms of recurrent typical angina in the absence of significant obstructive CAD on ICA. All patients underwent CCTA, ICA and IVUS. MB length and depth by CCTA agreed well with length (0.6±23.7 mm) and depth (CT coverage) as seen on IVUS. The product of CT length and depth (CT coverage), (MB muscle index (MMI)), ≥31 predicted an abnormal diastolic fractional flow reserve (dFFR) ≤0.76 with a sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 62% respectively (area under the curve=0.722).
In patients with recurrent symptoms of typical angina yet no obstructive CAD, clinicians should consider dynamic ischemia from an MB in the differential diagnosis. The product of length and depth (i.e., MMI) by CCTA may provide some non-invasive insight into the hemodynamic significance of a myocardial bridge, as compared with invasive assessment with dFFR.
心肌桥(MB)在无症状个体的冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)中很常见,但在反复出现典型心绞痛症状且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中,评估其潜在的血流动力学意义具有临床相关性。本研究旨在比较 CCTA 与有创冠状动脉造影(ICA),包括血管内超声(IVUS),以确认 MB 形态并评估其在有症状患者中的功能意义。
我们回顾性地从 2009 年至 2014 年的临床数据库中确定了 59 例患者,这些患者因反复出现典型心绞痛症状而怀疑存在 MB,而 ICA 未见明显阻塞性 CAD。所有患者均接受了 CCTA、ICA 和 IVUS 检查。CCTA 上 MB 的长度和深度与 IVUS 上所见的长度(0.6±23.7mm)和深度(CT 覆盖范围)吻合良好。CT 长度和深度的乘积(CT 覆盖范围)(MB 心肌指数(MMI))≥31 预测异常舒张期血流储备分数(dFFR)≤0.76,其敏感性和特异性分别为 74%和 62%(曲线下面积=0.722)。
在反复出现典型心绞痛症状且无阻塞性 CAD 的患者中,临床医生应将 MB 引起的动态缺血纳入鉴别诊断。与 dFFR 的有创评估相比,CCTA 上的长度和深度乘积(即 MMI)可能为 MB 的血流动力学意义提供一些非侵入性的见解。