Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3692-3701. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06778-w. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
To determine the potential impact of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) on the diagnostic efficiency and effectiveness of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA.
This observational cohort study included patients with suspected CAD who had been randomized to cardiac CT in the CRESCENT I and II trials. On-site CT-FFR was blindly performed in all patients with at least one ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA and no exclusion criteria for CT-FFR. We retrospectively assessed the effect of adding CT-FFR to the CT protocol in patients with a stenosis ≥ 50% on CCTA in terms of diagnostic effectiveness, i.e., the number of additional tests required to determine the final diagnosis, reclassification of the initial management strategy, and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) efficiency, i.e., ICA rate without ≥ 50% CAD.
Fifty-three patients out of the 372 patients (14%) had at least one ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA of whom 42/53 patients (79%) had no exclusion criteria for CT-FFR. CT-FFR showed a hemodynamically significant stenosis (≤ 0.80) in 27/53 patients (51%). The availability of CT-FFR would have reduced the number of patients requiring additional testing by 57%-points compared with CCTA alone (37/53 vs. 7/53, p < 0.001). The initial management strategy would have changed for 30 patients (57%, p < 0.001). Reserving ICA for patients with a CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 would have reduced the number of ICA following CCTA by 13%-points (p = 0.016).
Implementation of on-site CT-FFR may change management and improve diagnostic efficiency and effectiveness in patients with obstructive CAD on CCTA.
• The availability of on-site CT-FFR in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with obstructive CAD on CCTA would have significantly reduced the number of patients requiring additional testing compared with CCTA alone. • The implementation of on-site CT-FFR would have changed the initial management strategy significantly in the patients with obstructive CAD on CCTA. • Restricting ICA to patients with a positive CT-FFR would have significantly reduced the ICA rate in patients with obstructive CAD on CCTA.
确定在有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)患者中,现场 CT 衍生的血流储备分数(CT-FFR)对 CCTA 诊断效率和效果的潜在影响。
这项观察性队列研究纳入了 CRESCENT I 和 II 试验中随机接受心脏 CT 的疑似 CAD 患者。对所有 CCTA 至少有一处≥50%狭窄且无 CT-FFR 排除标准的患者进行现场 CT-FFR。我们回顾性评估了在 CCTA 上狭窄≥50%的患者中添加 CT-FFR 对 CT 方案的诊断效果的影响,即确定最终诊断所需的额外检查次数、初始管理策略的重新分类以及侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)的效率,即没有≥50%CAD 的 ICA 率。
在 372 例患者中,53 例(14%)至少有一处 CCTA 上≥50%的狭窄,其中 42/53 例(79%)无 CT-FFR 排除标准。CT-FFR 显示 27/53 例(51%)患者存在血流动力学意义上的狭窄(≤0.80)。与单纯 CCTA 相比,CT-FFR 的可用性可使需要额外检查的患者数量减少 57 个百分点(37/53 比 7/53,p<0.001)。初始管理策略将改变 30 例患者(57%,p<0.001)。对于 CT-FFR≤0.80 的患者,将 ICA 保留用于 CT-FFR 可使 CCTA 后 ICA 数量减少 13 个百分点(p=0.016)。
在有阻塞性 CAD 的 CCTA 患者的诊断评估中实施现场 CT-FFR 可能会改变管理,并提高诊断效率和效果。
在有阻塞性 CAD 的 CCTA 患者的诊断评估中,现场 CT-FFR 的可用性与单纯 CCTA 相比,可显著减少需要额外检查的患者数量。
在有阻塞性 CAD 的 CCTA 患者中,实施现场 CT-FFR 将显著改变初始管理策略。
将 ICA 限制在 CT-FFR 阳性的患者中,可显著降低有阻塞性 CAD 的 CCTA 患者的 ICA 率。