• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的腹腔镜肾盂成形术:单中心6年经验

Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junctions Obstruction in Adults: 6 Years' Experience in One Center.

作者信息

Tolstrup Rikke Søgaard, Pank Marie Thue, Sander Lotte, Dørflinger Torben

机构信息

Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6743512. doi: 10.1155/2017/6743512. Epub 2017 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1155/2017/6743512
PMID:28691029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5485285/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common cause of symptomatic ureteral obstruction. The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with UPJO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical reports of 47 UPJO patients treated with laparoscopic pyeloplasty were retrospectively analysed. All patients were recruited from our center in the period 2004-2011.

RESULTS

We evaluated 47 patients. Mean age was 36 years and mean hospital stay 3.6 days. 42 (79%) of the patients had pain and 46 (98%) were diagnosed with hydronephrosis. 19 patients (40%) had a renal function below 40% of the affected kidney and 49% had impaired renal scan drainage. Postoperative significant improvement in pain score and renal scan drainage was found in 92% and 47% of the patients, respectively. Improvement of renal function > 10% was found in 11 patients (23%); the function remained stable in 31 patients (66%) and deteriorated > 10% in 5 patients (11%). We found no correlation between sex or age and the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO leads to relief of pain and preserved or improved renal function in the majority of the patients. Overall laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an efficient treatment for UPJO.

摘要

目的

肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻(UPJO)是有症状的输尿管梗阻的常见原因。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗UPJO患者的疗效。

患者与方法

回顾性分析47例接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗的UPJO患者的病历报告。所有患者均于2004年至2011年期间从本中心招募。

结果

我们评估了47例患者。平均年龄为36岁,平均住院时间为3.6天。42例(79%)患者有疼痛,46例(98%)被诊断为肾积水。19例(40%)患者患侧肾功能低于40%,49%患者肾扫描引流受损。分别有92%和47%的患者术后疼痛评分和肾扫描引流有显著改善。11例(23%)患者肾功能改善>10%;31例(66%)患者肾功能保持稳定,5例(11%)患者肾功能恶化>10%。我们发现性别或年龄与疗效之间无相关性。

结论

腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗UPJO可使大多数患者疼痛缓解,肾功能得以保留或改善。总体而言,腹腔镜肾盂成形术是治疗UPJO的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/6aeab8506550/BMRI2017-6743512.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/dd363a4c19ec/BMRI2017-6743512.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/517700219aae/BMRI2017-6743512.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/6aeab8506550/BMRI2017-6743512.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/dd363a4c19ec/BMRI2017-6743512.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/517700219aae/BMRI2017-6743512.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d27a/5485285/6aeab8506550/BMRI2017-6743512.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junctions Obstruction in Adults: 6 Years' Experience in One Center.成人肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的腹腔镜肾盂成形术:单中心6年经验
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:6743512. doi: 10.1155/2017/6743512. Epub 2017 Jun 11.
2
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗儿童复发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.肾积水:外在血管性梗阻与内在肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻组的比较以及对血管牵拉手术的反对意见
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):80.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.014. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
4
Dismembered laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty versus nondismembered laparoscopic Y-V pyeloplasty in the treatment of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a prospective study.离断式腹腔镜Anderson-Hynes 肾盂成形术与非离断式腹腔镜 Y-V 肾盂成形术治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻患者的前瞻性研究。
J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1165-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0642. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
5
Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.开放手术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的疗效比较:附49例报告
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):169-74.
6
Laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in five pediatric cases of pelvic kidneys.腹腔镜治疗五例盆腔肾患儿的肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Dec;11(6):353.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.042. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
7
[Advance in re-do pyeloplasty for the management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after surgery].[再次肾盂成形术治疗术后复发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的进展]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Aug 18;52(4):794-798. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.036.
8
[Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].三维与二维腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;52(10):771-4.
9
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children by polar vessels. Is laparoscopic vascular hitching procedure a good solution? Single center experience on 35 consecutive patients.儿童输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻与肾极血管。腹腔镜血管牵拉术是一种好的解决方案吗?连续35例患者的单中心经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Feb;51(2):310-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与顺行性肾盂内切开术:100例患者的比较及输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻微创治疗的新算法
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.115.

引用本文的文献

1
Transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of operative and oncological outcomes between posterior and anterolateral tumours.经腹机器人辅助部分肾切除术:后位肿瘤与前外侧肿瘤手术及肿瘤学结局的比较
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04372-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的手术及功能结果比较
Turk J Urol. 2014 Mar;40(1):24-30. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.06956.
2
Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database.开放手术与微创肾盂成形术治疗输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的成人患者30天围手术期结局比较:对前瞻性全国数据库中593例患者的分析
World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2107-13. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1586-4. Epub 2015 May 13.
3
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻患者的比较:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Scand J Urol. 2013 Aug;47(4):251-64. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.780184. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty.微创与开放肾盂成形术的手术及功能结果比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Dec;22(10):968-71. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0142. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
5
Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: comparison of two surgical approaches- a single centre experience of three years.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术:两种手术方式的比较——单中心三年经验
Indian J Surg. 2011 Aug;73(4):264-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-011-0237-2. Epub 2011 Apr 26.