• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腹机器人辅助部分肾切除术:后位肿瘤与前外侧肿瘤手术及肿瘤学结局的比较

Transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of operative and oncological outcomes between posterior and anterolateral tumours.

作者信息

Thomsen Frederik F, Petersson Rasmus D, Schou-Jensen Katrine S, Rashu Badal S, Niebuhr Malene H, Azawi Nessn H

机构信息

Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.

Department of Urology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04372-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-025-04372-x
PMID:39808377
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare operative and oncological outcomes, as well as the risk of postoperative complications in patients who underwent transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours located either posteriorly or anterolaterally.

METHODS

Retrospective, consecutive study including 451 patients who underwent transperitoneal RAPN for non-metastatic, localised renal tumours from May 2016 to April 2023. Operative data included duration of the procedure, warm ischaemia time, and blood loss; oncological data included surgical margins and recurrence; and 90-day postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

In total, 140 (31%) patients had tumours with a posterior location. The median follow-up was 3.3 (IQR 1.8-5.0) years. There were no differences in operative outcomes or length of hospital stay between the two groups. Positive surgical margins were recorded in 9% of the patients with posterior tumours compared to 7% of patients with anterolateral tumours, p = 0.60. The estimated probability of recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 95.2% (95% CI 87.4-98.2) for patients with posterior tumours and 96.7% (95% CI 92.3-98.6) for patients with anterolateral tumours, p = 0.4. Patients with posterior tumours had a similar risk of any complication (OR 1.24 [95% CI 0.80-1.91]) and CD ≥ III (OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.28-1.67]) compared to patients with anterolateral tumours.

CONCLUSION

This study found that patients with posterior tumours had longer operating times and hospital stays following transperitoneal RAPN compared to those with anterolateral tumours but without increased complications or poorer oncological outcomes.

摘要

目的

比较经腹腔机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)治疗位于后侧或前外侧肾肿瘤患者的手术及肿瘤学结局,以及术后并发症风险。

方法

回顾性连续研究,纳入2016年5月至2023年4月期间因非转移性局限性肾肿瘤接受经腹腔RAPN的451例患者。手术数据包括手术时长、热缺血时间和失血量;肿瘤学数据包括手术切缘和复发情况;术后90天并发症根据Clavien-Dindo分类进行分级。

结果

共有140例(31%)患者的肿瘤位于后侧。中位随访时间为3.3(四分位间距1.8 - 5.0)年。两组患者的手术结局或住院时间无差异。后侧肿瘤患者中9%出现手术切缘阳性,前外侧肿瘤患者中这一比例为7%,p = 0.60。后侧肿瘤患者5年无复发生存的估计概率为95.2%(95%置信区间87.4 - 98.2),前外侧肿瘤患者为96.7%(95%置信区间92.3 - 98.6),p = 0.4。与前外侧肿瘤患者相比,后侧肿瘤患者发生任何并发症的风险相似(比值比1.24 [95%置信区间0.80 - 1.91]),发生Clavien-Dindo分级≥III级并发症的风险也相似(比值比0.73 [95%置信区间0.28 - 1.67])。

结论

本研究发现,与前外侧肿瘤患者相比,经腹腔RAPN治疗后侧肿瘤的患者手术时间和住院时间更长,但并发症未增加,肿瘤学结局也未变差。

相似文献

1
Transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of operative and oncological outcomes between posterior and anterolateral tumours.经腹机器人辅助部分肾切除术:后位肿瘤与前外侧肿瘤手术及肿瘤学结局的比较
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jan 14. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04372-x.
2
Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar and Nonhilar Renal Masses: Comparison of Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Results in a Multicentre Prospective Cohort (NEPRAH Study, UroCCR 175).机器人辅助肾门及非肾门肾肿块部分肾切除术:多中心前瞻性队列研究的围手术期、肿瘤学及功能结果比较(NEPRAH研究,UroCCR 175)
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Dec;7(6):1487-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Early surgical outcomes and oncological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre study.机器人辅助部分肾切除术的早期手术结果及肿瘤学疗效:一项多中心研究
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):550-555. doi: 10.1111/bju.13743. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
4
'Trifecta' outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney: a Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative (VCQI) database analysis.孤立肾机器人辅助部分肾切除术的“三连胜”结局:Vattikuti集体质量改进计划(VCQI)数据库分析
BJU Int. 2018 Jan;121(1):119-123. doi: 10.1111/bju.13967. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumours with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: peri-operative and oncological outcomes.RENAL肾计量评分≥7的复杂肾肿瘤患者机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的比较:围手术期及肿瘤学结局
BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):126-30. doi: 10.1111/bju.13214. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
6
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal versus retraperitoneal partial nephrectomy for posterior-lateral renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜经腹腔与后腹腔途径治疗后外侧肾肿瘤的围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 29;18(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01963-1.
7
Comparison of perioperative, renal and oncologic outcomes in robotic-assisted versus open partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术的围手术期、肾脏及肿瘤学结局比较
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Mar;88(3):E194-E199. doi: 10.1111/ans.14154. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
8
Strategies for success: a multi-institutional study on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal lesions.成功策略:一项关于机器人辅助部分肾切除术治疗复杂肾脏病变的多机构研究。
BJU Int. 2018 May;121 Suppl 3:40-47. doi: 10.1111/bju.14059. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Comparison of robot-assisted and open partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumours: a single centre experience.机器人辅助与开放性部分肾切除术治疗完全内生性肾肿瘤的比较:单中心经验
BJU Int. 2016 Dec;118(6):946-951. doi: 10.1111/bju.13572. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
10
Novel technique: direct access partial nephrectomy approach through a transperitoneal working space (Roskilde technique).新技术:经腹膜工作空间的直接入路部分肾切除术(罗斯基勒技术)。
Scand J Urol. 2019 Aug;53(4):261-264. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1624609. Epub 2019 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management after Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Single Center Study.腹腔镜与超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞用于前列腺癌根治术后的镇痛管理:一项单中心研究结果
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 23;13(12):1634. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121634.
2
Robot-Assisted Renal Surgery with the New Hugo Ras System: Trocar Placement and Docking Settings.使用新型Hugo Ras系统的机器人辅助肾手术:套管针放置与对接设置
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 13;13(9):1372. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091372.
3
Robotic Medtronic Hugo™ RAS System Is Now Reality: Introduction to a New Simulation Platform for Training Residents.
机器人美敦力 Hugo™ RAS 系统现已成为现实:一种新的住院医师培训模拟平台介绍。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;23(17):7348. doi: 10.3390/s23177348.
4
Robotic Surgery in Urology: History from PROBOT to HUGO.机器人外科学在泌尿科的应用:从 PROBOT 到 HUGO 的历史。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;23(16):7104. doi: 10.3390/s23167104.
5
The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: a systematic review.泌尿外科主要腹腔镜和机器人手术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):2037-2057. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345.
6
Impact of ischemia time during partial nephrectomy on short- and long-term renal function.肾部分切除术中缺血时间对短期和长期肾功能的影响。
Scand J Urol. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):86-89. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2023.2172075. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
7
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update.欧洲泌尿外科学会肾癌指南:2022 年更新版。
Eur Urol. 2022 Oct;82(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
8
Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block reduces opioid consumption and prolongs time to first opioid demand after laparoscopic nephrectomy.经竖脊肌腰方肌阻滞可减少腹腔镜肾切除术后阿片类药物的消耗,并延长首次需要阿片类药物的时间。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jan;46(1):18-24. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101745. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Oncological outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial neoplasia in Denmark.丹麦根治性肾输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮肿瘤的肿瘤学结果。
Scand J Urol. 2020 Feb;54(1):58-64. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1710562. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
10
Clinical Stage Migration and Survival for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States.美国肾细胞癌的临床分期迁移和生存情况。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;2(4):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Sep 25.