Harduar Morano Laurel, Waller Anna E
1 Carolina Center for Health Informatics, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2017 Jul/Aug;132(1_suppl):40S-47S. doi: 10.1177/0033354917710946.
To improve heat-related illness surveillance, we evaluated and refined North Carolina's heat syndrome case definition.
We analyzed North Carolina emergency department (ED) visits during 2012-2014. We evaluated the current heat syndrome case definition (ie, keywords in chief complaint/triage notes or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ ICD-9-CM] codes) and additional heat-related inclusion and exclusion keywords. We calculated the positive predictive value and sensitivity of keyword-identified ED visits and manually reviewed ED visits to identify true positives and false positives.
The current heat syndrome case definition identified 8928 ED visits; additional inclusion keywords identified another 598 ED visits. Of 4006 keyword-identified ED visits, 3216 (80.3%) were captured by 4 phrases: "heat ex" (n = 1674, 41.8%), "overheat" (n = 646, 16.1%), "too hot" (n = 594, 14.8%), and "heatstroke" (n = 302, 7.5%). Among the 267 ED visits identified by keyword only, a burn diagnosis or the following keywords resulted in a false-positive rate >95%: "burn," "grease," "liquid," "oil," "radiator," "antifreeze," "hot tub," "hot spring," and "sauna." After applying the revised inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 9132 heat-related ED visits: 2157 by keyword only, 5493 by ICD-9-CM code only, and 1482 by both (sensitivity = 27.0%, positive predictive value = 40.7%). Cases identified by keywords were strongly correlated with cases identified by ICD-9-CM codes (rho = .94, P < .001).
Revising the heat syndrome case definition through the use of additional inclusion and exclusion criteria substantially improved the accuracy of the surveillance system. Other jurisdictions may benefit from refining their heat syndrome case definition.
为改善与热相关疾病的监测,我们对北卡罗来纳州的热综合征病例定义进行了评估和完善。
我们分析了2012 - 2014年北卡罗来纳州急诊科的就诊情况。我们评估了当前的热综合征病例定义(即主诉/分诊记录中的关键词或国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本[ICD - 9 - CM]编码)以及其他与热相关的纳入和排除关键词。我们计算了关键词识别的急诊科就诊的阳性预测值和敏感性,并人工审核急诊科就诊情况以识别真阳性和假阳性。
当前的热综合征病例定义识别出8928次急诊科就诊;额外的纳入关键词又识别出598次就诊。在4006次关键词识别的急诊科就诊中,3216次(80.3%)由4个短语捕获:“heat ex”(n = 1674,41.8%)、“overheat”(n = 646,16.1%)、“too hot”(n = 594,14.8%)和“heatstroke”(n = 302,7.5%)。在仅由关键词识别的267次急诊科就诊中,烧伤诊断或以下关键词导致假阳性率>95%:“burn”、“grease”、“liquid”、“oil”、“radiator”、“antifreeze”、“hot tub”、“hot spring”和“sauna”。应用修订后的纳入和排除标准后,我们识别出9132次与热相关的急诊科就诊:仅通过关键词识别2157次,仅通过ICD - 9 - CM编码识别5493次,两者都识别1482次(敏感性 = 27.0%,阳性预测值 = 40.7%)。关键词识别的病例与ICD - 9 - CM编码识别的病例高度相关(rho = 0.94,P < 0.001)。
通过使用额外的纳入和排除标准修订热综合征病例定义,显著提高了监测系统的准确性。其他司法管辖区可能会从完善其热综合征病例定义中受益。