Fechter-Leggett Ethan D, Vaidyanathan Ambarish, Choudhary Ekta
Environmental Health Tracking Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Mailstop F-60, Chamblee, GA, 30341, USA.
Field Studies Branch, Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Rd, Mailstop H2800, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0064-7.
Variability of heat stress illness (HSI) by urbanicity and climate region has rarely been considered in previous HSI studies. We investigated temporal and geographic trends in HSI emergency department (ED) visits in CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (Tracking) states for 2005-2010. We obtained county-level HSI ED visit data for 14 Tracking states. We used the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme to categorize counties by urbanicity as (1) large central metropolitan (LCM), (2) large fringe metropolitan, (3) small-medium metropolitan, or (4) nonmetropolitan (NM). We also assigned counties to one of six US climate regions. Negative binomial regression was used to examine trends in HSI ED visits over time across all counties and by urbanicity for each climate region, adjusting for pertinent variables. During 2005-2010, there were 98,462 HSI ED visits in the 14 states. ED visits for HSI decreased 3.0% (p < 0.01) per year. Age-adjusted incidence rates of HSI ED visits increased from most urban to most rural. Overall, ED visits were significantly higher for NM areas (IRR = 1.41, p < 0.01) than for LCM areas. The same pattern was observed in all six climate regions; compared with LCM, NM areas had from 14 to 90% more ED visits for HSI. These findings of significantly increased HSI ED visit rates in more rural settings suggest a need to consider HSI ED visit variability by county urbanicity and climate region when designing and implementing local HSI preventive measures and interventions.
以往关于热应激疾病(HSI)的研究很少考虑城市化程度和气候区域对HSI的影响。我们调查了2005 - 2010年疾病控制与预防中心环境公共卫生跟踪网络(跟踪网络)覆盖的各州中,HSI患者急诊就诊的时间和地理趋势。我们获取了14个跟踪网络覆盖州的县级HSI急诊就诊数据。我们使用国家卫生统计中心的城乡分类方案,根据城市化程度将县分为:(1)大型中心都市(LCM)、(2)大型边缘都市、(3)中小型都市、或(4)非都市(NM)。我们还将各县归入美国六个气候区域之一。采用负二项回归分析,研究所有县以及每个气候区域内不同城市化程度的县中,HSI急诊就诊随时间的变化趋势,并对相关变量进行了调整。2005 - 2010年期间,14个州共有98,462例HSI急诊就诊病例。HSI急诊就诊量每年下降3.0%(p < 0.01)。HSI急诊就诊的年龄调整发病率从城市化程度最高的地区到最低的地区呈上升趋势。总体而言,NM地区的急诊就诊量(发病率比=1.41,p < 0.01)显著高于LCM地区。在所有六个气候区域均观察到相同模式;与LCM地区相比,NM地区因HSI的急诊就诊量多14%至90%。这些在农村地区HSI急诊就诊率显著增加的研究结果表明,在设计和实施当地HSI预防措施及干预措施时,需要考虑按县的城市化程度和气候区域来分析HSI急诊就诊的差异。