Schweizer Don, Cisneros Ricardo, Traina Samuel, Ghezzehei Teamrat A, Shaw Glenn
Environmental Systems Graduate Group, University of California, Merced, 5200 N. Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, 5200 N. Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:345-356. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
Wildland fire is an important ecological process in the California Sierra Nevada. Personal accounts from pre-20th century describe a much smokier environment than present day. The policy of suppression beginning in the early 20th century and climate change are contributing to increased megafires. We use a single particulate monitoring site at the wildland urban interface to explore impacts from prescribed, managed, and full suppression wildland fires from 2006 to 2015 producing a contextual assessment of smoke impacts over time at the landscape level. Prescribed fire had little effect on local fine particulate matter (PM) air quality with readings typical of similar non-fire times; hourly and daily good to moderate Air Quality Index (AQI) for PM, maximum hourly concentrations 21-103 μg m, and mean concentrations between 7.7 and 13.2 μg m. Hourly and daily AQI was typically good or moderate during managed fires with 3 h and one day reaching unhealthy while the site remained below National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), with maximum hourly concentrations 27-244 μg m, and mean concentrations 6.7-11.7 μg m. The large high intensity fire in this area created the highest short term impacts (AQI unhealthy for 4 h and very unhealthy for 1 h), 11 unhealthy for sensitive days, and produced the only annual value (43.9 μg m) over the NAAQS 98th percentile for PM (35 μg m). Pinehurst remained below the federal standards for PM when wildland fire in the local area was managed to 7800 ha (8-22% of the historic burn area). Considering air quality impacts from smoke using the NAAQS at a landscape level over time can give land and air managers a metric for broader evaluation of smoke impacts particularly when assessing ecologically beneficial fire. Allowing managers to control the amount and timing of individual wildland fire emissions can help lessen large smoke impacts to public health from a megafire.
野火是加利福尼亚内华达山脉的一个重要生态过程。20世纪前的个人记述描述的环境比现在烟雾弥漫得多。20世纪初开始的灭火政策和气候变化导致特大火灾增多。我们利用一个位于城乡结合部的单一颗粒物监测点,探究2006年至2015年规定火烧、管控火烧和完全灭火的野火产生的影响,对景观层面烟雾影响随时间的变化进行背景评估。规定火烧对当地细颗粒物(PM)空气质量影响不大,读数与类似非火灾时期的典型读数相同;PM的小时和日空气质量指数(AQI)为良至中度,每小时最大浓度为21 - 103微克/立方米,平均浓度在7.7至13.2微克/立方米之间。在管控火烧期间,小时和日AQI通常为良或中度,有3小时和1天达到不健康水平,而该监测点仍低于国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS),每小时最大浓度为27 - 244微克/立方米,平均浓度为6.7 - 11.7微克/立方米。该地区的大型高强度火灾造成了最高的短期影响(AQI有4小时不健康、1小时非常不健康),有11天对敏感人群不健康,并且产生了唯一超过PM的NAAQS第98百分位数(35微克/立方米)的年度值(43.9微克/立方米)。当当地野火面积控制在7800公顷(占历史燃烧面积的8 - 22%)时,派恩赫斯特的PM仍低于联邦标准。随着时间的推移,在景观层面使用NAAQS考虑烟雾对空气质量的影响,可以为土地和空气管理者提供一个指标,用于更广泛地评估烟雾影响,特别是在评估具有生态益处的火灾时。允许管理者控制单次野火排放的数量和时间,有助于减轻特大火灾产生的大量烟雾对公众健康的影响。