Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Chest. 2018 Jan;153(1):251-265. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.06.036. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
Although noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been used since the 1950s in the polio epidemic, the development of modern bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) devices did not become a reality until the 1990s. Over the past 25 years, BPAP technology options have increased exponentially. The number of patients receiving this treatment both in the acute setting and at home is growing steadily. However, a knowledge gap exists in the way the settings on these devices are adjusted to achieve synchrony and match the patient's unique physiology of respiratory failure. This issue is further complicated by differences in pressure and flow dynamic settings among different types of NIV devices available for inpatient and home care.
虽然无创通气(NIV)自 20 世纪 50 年代以来就在脊髓灰质炎流行期间得到应用,但直到 20 世纪 90 年代现代双水平气道正压通气(BPAP)设备的发展才成为现实。在过去的 25 年中,BPAP 技术选择呈指数级增长。在急性和家庭环境中接受这种治疗的患者数量也在稳步增长。然而,在调整这些设备的设置以实现同步并匹配患者呼吸衰竭的独特生理方面,仍然存在知识差距。这个问题由于不同类型的 NIV 设备在压力和流量动力学设置方面存在差异,使得其在住院和家庭护理中的应用变得更加复杂。