Servei de Pneumologia. Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Carrer Parc Taulí s/n, 08208, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, CIBERES, Bunyola, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):23814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03291-y.
Treatments that require the introduction of external gas into the non-invasive ventilation (NIV) circuit, such as aerosol and oxygen therapy, may influence the performance of the ventilator trigger system. The aim of the study was to determine the presence and type of asynchronies induced by external gas in the NIV circuit in a bench model and in a group of patients undergoing chronic NIV. Bench study: Four ventilators (one with two different trigger design types) and three gas sources (continuous flow at 4 and 9 l/min and pulsatile flow at 9 l/min) were selected in an active simulator model. The sensitivity of the trigger, the gas introduction position, the ventilatory pattern and the level of effort were also modified. The same ventilators and gas conditions were used in patients undergoing chronic NIV. Bench: the introduction of external gas caused asynchronies in 35.9% of cases (autotriggering 73%, ineffective effort 27%). Significant differences (p < 0.01) were detected according to the ventilator model and the gas source. In seven patients, the introduction of external gas induced asynchrony in 20.4% of situations (77% autotriggering). As in the bench study, there were differences in the occurrence of asynchronies depending on the ventilator model and gas source used. The introduction of external gas produces alterations in the ventilator trigger. These alterations are variable, and depend on the ventilator design and gas source. This phenomenon makes it advisable to monitor the patient at the start of treatment.
治疗需要将外部气体引入无创通气(NIV)回路,例如气溶胶和氧气治疗,可能会影响呼吸机触发系统的性能。本研究的目的是确定在台架模型和一组接受慢性 NIV 的患者中,外部气体在 NIV 回路中引起的不同类型的不同步现象。
在主动模拟器模型中选择了四种呼吸机(一种具有两种不同的触发设计类型)和三种气体源(4 和 9 L/min 的连续流和 9 L/min 的脉冲流)。还修改了触发的灵敏度、气体引入位置、通气模式和努力程度。在接受慢性 NIV 的患者中使用了相同的呼吸机和气体条件。
在台架中,外部气体的引入导致 35.9%的情况下出现不同步(自动触发 73%,无效努力 27%)。根据呼吸机型号和气体源,检测到显著差异(p<0.01)。在七名患者中,外部气体的引入导致 20.4%的情况下出现不同步(自动触发 77%)。与台架研究一样,不同的呼吸机型号和气体源的使用会导致不同步的发生。
外部气体的引入会改变呼吸机的触发。这些变化是可变的,取决于呼吸机的设计和气体源。这种现象使得在开始治疗时对患者进行监测是明智的。