• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transparency and public accessibility of clinical trial information in Croatia: how it affects patient participation in clinical trials.克罗地亚临床试验信息的透明度和公众可及性:其如何影响患者参与临床试验。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):259-269. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.027.
2
Open-access clinical trial registries: the Italian scenario.开放获取的临床试验注册机构:意大利的情况。
Trials. 2012 Oct 18;13:194. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-194.
3
Noncommercial US Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.非商业性美国资助者的试验注册、摘要结果获取和个体患者数据可及性政策。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187498. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7498.
4
Clinical trial transparency: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved recently in Europe.临床试验透明度:对与近期在欧洲批准的新药相关的公司赞助试验结果披露情况的评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Mar;30(3):395-405. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860371. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
5
Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2014.临床试验透明度更新:评估 2014 年在欧洲批准的新药相关的公司赞助试验结果的披露情况。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Jul;34(7):1239-1243. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1415057. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
EUROCOURSE recipe for cancer surveillance by visible population-based cancer RegisTrees in Europe: From roots to fruits.欧洲基于可见人群的癌症登记树进行癌症监测的EUROCOURSE方案:从根源到成果。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jun;51(9):1050-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
7
Clinical trials registries: towards improved access to therapeutic data.临床试验注册库:致力于改善治疗数据的获取
Prescrire Int. 2008 Dec;17(98):256-9.
8
Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2013.临床试验透明度更新:对2013年在欧洲获批的与新药相关的公司资助试验结果披露情况的评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):473-478. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1263612. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
9
Clinical trial transparency update: an assessment of the disclosure of results of company-sponsored trials associated with new medicines approved in Europe in 2012.临床试验透明度更新:对2012年在欧洲获批的与新药相关的公司资助试验结果披露情况的评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(7):1431-5. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1047749. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
10
Plain Language Summaries of Clinical Trial Results: A Preliminary Study to Assess Availability of Easy-to-Understand Summaries and Approaches to Improving Public Engagement.临床试验结果的简明报告:评估易于理解的摘要的可用性和提高公众参与度的方法的初步研究。
Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Dec;34(6):401-406. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00359-4. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Bibliometric and clinical trial registry analysis of the University of Split medical research from 1997 to 2022.1997年至2022年斯普利特大学医学研究的文献计量学与临床试验注册分析
Croat Med J. 2025 May 7;66(2):153-163. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2025.66.153.
2
Is there a relationship between attitudes of general practitioners/family doctors and attitudes of their patients regarding industry-sponsored clinical investigations? A cross-sectional survey in a convenience sample of doctors and patients across nine European countries.家庭医生/全科医生的态度与其患者对行业赞助临床研究的态度之间是否存在关系?在欧洲九个国家的便利样本医生和患者中进行的横断面调查。
Croat Med J. 2024 Aug 31;65(4):313-327. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.327.
3
Reporting violations of European Charter of Patients' Rights: analysis of patient complaints in Croatia.报告违反欧洲患者权利宪章的行为:克罗地亚患者投诉分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 8;22(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00714-3.
4
Balkan Clinical Research Registry: Established by Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina.巴尔干临床研究注册中心:由波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那医学科学院设立。
Med Arch. 2020 Dec;74(6):412-415. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2020.74.412-415.

本文引用的文献

1
Trial Reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov - The Final Rule.ClinicalTrials.gov 中的试验报告 - 最终规则。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1998-2004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1611785. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
2
Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation Among Saudi Nationals: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特国民参与癌症临床试验的障碍:一项横断面研究。
J Relig Health. 2017 Apr;56(2):623-634. doi: 10.1007/s10943-016-0306-8.
3
Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why.德国互联网健康信息搜索中的性别差异及虚拟医患关系:关于男性与女性差异及原因的探索性结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4127.
4
Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting.基于国际共识会议的“开放(克服阴性结果发表失败)”项目得出的减少临床研究中传播偏倚的循证建议。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 5;5(5):e006666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006666.
5
Barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment to a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care: lessons for future trials.基层医疗中整群随机对照试验患者招募的障碍与促进因素:对未来试验的启示
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Mar 12;15:18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0012-3.
6
Awareness and Perceptions of Clinical Trials in Cancer Patients and Their Families in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯癌症患者及其家属对临床试验的认知与看法
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):655-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0797-0.
7
Croatia: health system review.克罗地亚:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2014;16(3):xvii-xviii, 1-162.
8
Are patients well informed about the fasting requirements for laboratory blood testing?患者是否充分了解实验室血液检测的禁食要求?
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(3):326-31. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.040.
9
Low level of adherence to instructions for 24-hour urine collection among hospital outpatients.医院门诊患者对 24 小时尿液收集说明的遵从度低。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(3):316-20. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.038.
10
Bias in research.研究中的偏倚。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(1):12-5. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.003.

克罗地亚临床试验信息的透明度和公众可及性:其如何影响患者参与临床试验。

Transparency and public accessibility of clinical trial information in Croatia: how it affects patient participation in clinical trials.

作者信息

Šolić Ivana, Stipčić Ana, Pavličević Ivančica, Marušić Ana

机构信息

Medical student, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

Department of Health Studies, University of Split, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):259-269. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.027.

DOI:10.11613/BM.2017.027
PMID:28694716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5493165/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite increased visibility of clinical trials through international trial registries, patients often remain uninformed of their existence, especially if they do not have access to adequate information about clinical research, including the language of the information. The aim of this study was to describe the context for transparency of clinical trials in Croatia in relation to countries in Central and Eastern Europe, and to assess how informed Croatian patients are about clinical trials and their accessibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed the transparency of clinical trials from the data available in the public domain. We also conducted an anonymous survey on a convenience sample of 257 patients visiting two family medicine offices or an oncology department in south Croatia, and members of national patients' associations.

RESULTS

Despite legal provisions for transparency of clinical trials in Croatia, they are still not sufficiently visible in the public domain. Among countries from Central and Eastern Europe, Croatia has the fewest number of registered trials in the EU Clinical Trials Registry. 66% of the patients in the survey were aware of the existence of clinical trials but only 15% were informed about possibilities of participating in a trial. Although 58% of the respondents were willing to try new treatments, only 6% actually participated in a clinical trial. Only 2% of the respondents were aware of publicly available trial registries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that there is low transparency of clinical trials in Croatia, and that Croatian patients are not fully aware of clinical trials and the possibilities of participating in them, despite reported availability of Internet resources and good communication with their physicians. There is a need for active policy measures to increase the awareness of and access to clinical trials to patients in Croatia, particularly in their own language.

摘要

引言

尽管通过国际试验注册机构临床试验的可见度有所提高,但患者往往仍不了解其存在,特别是如果他们无法获取有关临床研究的充分信息,包括信息的语言。本研究的目的是描述克罗地亚临床试验透明度相对于中欧和东欧国家的背景情况,并评估克罗地亚患者对临床试验及其可及性的了解程度。

材料与方法

我们根据公开领域可得的数据评估了临床试验的透明度。我们还对克罗地亚南部两家家庭医疗诊所或肿瘤科的257名就诊患者以及全国患者协会成员组成的便利样本进行了匿名调查。

结果

尽管克罗地亚有关于临床试验透明度的法律规定,但在公开领域它们的可见度仍然不够。在中欧和东欧国家中,克罗地亚在欧盟临床试验注册机构中注册的试验数量最少。调查中66%的患者知晓临床试验的存在,但只有15%的患者了解参与试验的可能性。尽管58%的受访者愿意尝试新疗法,但实际只有6%参与了临床试验。只有2%的受访者知晓公开可用的试验注册机构。

结论

我们的研究表明,克罗地亚临床试验的透明度较低,克罗地亚患者并未充分了解临床试验及其参与可能性,尽管有报告称有互联网资源且与医生沟通良好。需要采取积极政策措施,提高克罗地亚患者对临床试验的认识并增加其获取途径,特别是以他们自己的语言。