School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Addiction. 2018 Feb;113(2):206-213. doi: 10.1111/add.13895. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
The social meanings, settings and habitual nature of health-related activities and their integration into our daily lives are often overlooked in quantitative public health research. This reflects an overly individualized approach to epidemiological surveillance and evaluations of public health interventions, based on models of behaviour that are rooted in social cognition and rational choice theories. This paper calls for a new approach to alcohol epidemiology and intervention research informed by theories of practice.
Practices are conceptualized as routinized types of human activity that are made up of, and can be recognized by, the coming together of several interwoven elements in the same situation (e.g. materials, meanings, skills, locations, timings). Different practices are interconnected-they can occur simultaneously (e.g. drinking and eating), hold each other in place (e.g. after-work drinks) or compete for time (e.g. parenting versus socializing). Applying these principles to alcohol research means shifting attention away from individuals and their behaviours and instead making drinking practices an important unit of analysis. Studying how drinking practices emerge, persist and decay over time, how they spread through populations and local or social networks and how they relate to other activities of everyday life promises new insights into how, why, where, when and with whom drinking and getting drunk occur.
Theories of practice provide a framework for generating new explanations of stability and change in alcohol consumption and other health behaviours. This framework offers potential for novel insights into the persistence of health inequalities, unanticipated consequences of policies and interventions and new interventions targets through understanding which elements of problematic practices are likely to be most modifiable. We hope this will generate novel insights into the emergence and decay of drinking practices over time and into the geographical and socio-demographic patterning of drinking. Theories of practice-informed research would consider how alcohol policies and population-level interventions might differentially affect different drinking practices.
在定量公共卫生研究中,往往忽视了与健康相关的活动的社会意义、背景和习惯性,以及它们与日常生活的融合。这反映出基于根植于社会认知和理性选择理论的行为模式的流行病学监测和公共卫生干预评估过于个体化。本文呼吁采用基于实践理论的新方法开展酒精流行病学和干预研究。
实践被概念化为有规律的人类活动类型,由同一情境中几个相互交织的要素(例如材料、意义、技能、地点、时间)的组合构成,并可以通过这些要素来识别。不同的实践是相互关联的——它们可以同时发生(例如喝酒和吃东西),相互支持(例如下班后喝酒),或者争夺时间(例如育儿和社交)。将这些原则应用于酒精研究意味着将注意力从个体及其行为上转移开,而是将饮酒行为作为一个重要的分析单位。研究饮酒行为如何随着时间的推移而出现、持续和消失,如何在人群和当地或社交网络中传播,以及如何与日常生活中的其他活动相关,有望为理解为什么、在哪里、何时以及与谁饮酒和醉酒提供新的见解。
实践理论为解释饮酒和其他健康行为的稳定性和变化提供了一个框架。该框架通过了解哪些有问题的实践要素最有可能改变,为理解健康不平等的持久性、政策和干预措施的意外后果以及新的干预目标提供了潜在的新见解。我们希望这将为了解饮酒行为随时间的出现和消失,以及饮酒的地理和社会人口分布模式提供新的见解。基于实践理论的研究将考虑酒精政策和人口干预措施如何对不同的饮酒行为产生不同的影响。