Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6576. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6576. Epub 2023 Jan 28.
Non-adherence to treatment is a frequently observed phenomenon amongst those on long-term treatment for chronic illnesses. This qualitative study draws upon the tenets of 'practice theory' to reveal what shapes patients' ability to adhere to the demanding treatment for drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) at three treatment sites in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province of Pakistan.
This qualitative study involved observation of service provision over a period of nine months of stay at, and embedment within the three treatment sites and in-depth interviews with 13 service providers and 22 patients who became non-adherent to their treatment.
Consistent with the extensive research based on the barriers and facilitator approach, both patients, and providers in our study also talked of patients' doubts about diagnosis and treatment efficacy, side-effects of drugs, economic constraints, unreliable disbursements of monetary incentive, attitude of providers and co-morbidities as reasons for non-adherence to treatment. Applying a practice theory perspective yielded more contextualised insights; inadequate help with patients' physical complaints, unempathetic responses to their queries, and failure to provide essential information, created conditions which hindered the establishment and maintenance of the 'practice' of adhering to treatment. These supply-side gaps created confusion, bred resentment, and exacerbated pre-existing distrust of public health services among patients, and ultimately drove them to disengage with the TB services and stop their treatment.
We argue that the lack of supply-side 'responsiveness' to patient needs beyond the provision of a few material inputs is what is lacking in the existing DR-TB program in Pakistan. We conclude that unless Pakistan's TB program explicitly engages with these supply side, system level gaps, patients will continue to struggle to adhere to their treatments and the TB program will continue to lose patients. Conceptually, we make a case for reimagining the act of adherence (or not) to long-term treatment as a 'Practice.'
在长期接受慢性病治疗的人群中,不遵医嘱治疗是一种常见现象。本定性研究借鉴“实践理论”的原则,揭示了在巴基斯坦开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省(KP)的三个治疗点,是什么塑造了患者坚持耐多药结核病(DR-TB)苛刻治疗的能力。
本定性研究包括在三个治疗点停留九个月期间观察服务提供情况,并深入访谈了 13 名服务提供者和 22 名不遵医嘱治疗的患者。
与基于障碍和促进因素方法的广泛研究一致,我们的研究中的患者和提供者也谈到了患者对诊断和治疗效果、药物副作用、经济限制、货币激励金不可靠发放、提供者态度和合并症的怀疑,这些都是导致治疗不依从的原因。应用实践理论视角产生了更具背景的见解;对患者身体投诉的帮助不足、对他们质疑的无动于衷反应,以及未能提供必要信息,创造了阻碍坚持治疗“实践”建立和维持的条件。这些供应方的差距造成了混乱、滋生了怨恨,并加剧了患者对公共卫生服务的先前存在的不信任,最终导致他们与结核病服务脱节并停止治疗。
我们认为,除了提供一些物质投入外,巴基斯坦现有耐多药结核病方案缺乏对患者需求的供应方“响应能力”。我们得出结论,除非巴基斯坦的结核病方案明确解决这些供应方、系统层面的差距,否则患者将继续难以坚持治疗,结核病方案将继续失去患者。从概念上讲,我们提出了将长期治疗的依从(或不依从)行为重新想象为一种“实践”的观点。