Radhakrishnan Rupa, Ahmed Shamima, Tilden Joshua Cole, Morales Humberto
1 Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Radiology, USA.
2 University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, USA.
Neuroradiol J. 2017 Dec;30(6):554-560. doi: 10.1177/1971400917719714. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Background and purpose The facial nerve is unique among cranial nerves in demonstrating normal enhancement of particular segments. The effect of varying T1 relaxivities of gadolinium-based contrast agents on facial nerve enhancement is unclear. In this study, we assess differences in normal facial nerve enhancement with two different gadolinium-based contrast agents, gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine. In addition, we evaluate differences in facial nerve enhancement with spin-echo (SE) T1 versus 3D inversion recovery prepared fast spoiled gradient-echo (FSPGR) post-contrast sequences. Methods A total of 140 facial nerves in 70 individuals were evaluated (70 with gadobutrol and 70 with gadopentetate dimeglumine) by two blinded reviewers. Differences in enhancement of facial nerve segments between the two agents were analyzed. Differences in enhancement between SE T1 and FSPGR imaging were also evaluated. Results There was no significant difference in facial nerve enhancement between gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Enhancement was commonly observed in the geniculate, tympanic and mastoid segments (98%-100%) with either contrast agent; enhancement was less common in the labyrinthine segments (9%-14%) and lateral canalicular segment (2%-5%). There was a smaller enhancing proportion of labyrinthine and tympanic segments with FSPGR as compared to SE T1 images with gadobutrol. Conclusion There is no significant difference in overall enhancement of the facial nerve between gadobutrol and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Mild enhancement of the lateral canalicular portion of the facial nerve may be a normal finding. With FSPGR sequence, there is lesser perceived enhancement of the labyrinthine and tympanic segments of the facial nerve with gadobutrol.
背景与目的 面神经在颅神经中独具特色,其特定节段可呈现正常强化。钆基造影剂不同的T1弛豫率对面神经强化的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们评估了两种不同的钆基造影剂钆布醇和钆喷酸葡胺在面神经正常强化方面的差异。此外,我们还评估了自旋回波(SE)T1加权像与三维反转恢复快速扰相梯度回波(FSPGR)对比剂增强后序列在面神经强化方面的差异。方法 由两名盲法阅片者对70例个体的140条面神经进行评估(70例使用钆布醇,70例使用钆喷酸葡胺)。分析两种造影剂之间面神经节段强化的差异。同时评估SE T1加权像与FSPGR成像之间强化的差异。结果 钆布醇和钆喷酸葡胺之间面神经强化无显著差异。两种造影剂均可在膝状、鼓室和乳突段观察到常见强化(98%-100%);在内耳道段(9%-14%)和外侧管段(2%-5%)强化较少见。与使用钆布醇的SE T1加权像相比,FSPGR序列在内耳道和鼓室段的强化比例较小。结论 钆布醇和钆喷酸葡胺在面神经总体强化方面无显著差异。面神经外侧管部分的轻度强化可能是正常表现。使用FSPGR序列时,钆布醇对面神经内耳道和鼓室段的强化显示较少。