Suppr超能文献

使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。

Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.

机构信息

National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) has proposed two related trauma diagnoses: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD). Using a newly developed, disorder-specific measure of PTSD and CPTSD called the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) the current study will (i) assess the factorial validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD; (ii) provide the first test of the discriminant validity of these constructs; and (iii) provide the first comparison of ICD-11, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), PTSD diagnostic rates using disorder-specific measures.

METHOD

ICD-11 and DSM-5 PTSD-specific measures were completed by a British clinical sample of trauma-exposed patients (N = 171). The structure and validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD were assessed by means of factor analysis and assessing relationships with criterion variables.

RESULTS

Diagnostic rates under ICD-11 were significantly lower than those under DSM-5. A two-factor second-order model reflecting the distinction between PTSD and CPTSD best represented the data from the ITQ; and the PTSD and CPTSD factors differentially predicted multiple psychological variables.

CONCLUSION

The factorial and discriminant validity of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD was supported, and ICD-11 produces fewer diagnostic cases than DSM-5.

摘要

目的

第 11 版《国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)提出了两个相关的创伤诊断:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)。本研究使用一种新开发的、针对特定障碍的 PTSD 和 CPTSD 测量工具——国际创伤问卷(ITQ),将(i)评估 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子有效性;(ii)首次检验这些结构的判别有效性;以及(iii)首次比较使用特定障碍测量工具的 ICD-11 和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的 PTSD 诊断率。

方法

ICD-11 和 DSM-5 特定于 PTSD 的测量工具由英国一组创伤暴露患者(N=171)完成。通过因子分析和评估与标准变量的关系,评估 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的结构和有效性。

结果

根据 ICD-11 的诊断率明显低于根据 DSM-5 的诊断率。一个反映 PTSD 和 CPTSD 区别的两因素二阶模型最能代表 ITQ 的数据;PTSD 和 CPTSD 因素分别预测了多个心理变量。

结论

ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的因子和判别有效性得到了支持,而且 ICD-11 比 DSM-5 产生的诊断案例更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验