Roberts Neil P, Hyland Philip, Fox Robert, Roberts Alice, Lewis Catrin, Cloitre Marylene, Brewin Chris R, Karatzias Thanos, Shevlin Mark, Gelezelyte Odeta, Bondjers Kristina, Fresno Andrés, Souch Alistair, Bisson Jonathan I
Psychology and Psychological Therapies Directorate, Cardiff & Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2494361. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2494361. Epub 2025 May 6.
The International Trauma Interview (ITI) is a structured clinician-administered measure developed to assess posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as defined in the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). This study aimed to investigate a psychometric evaluation of the ITI and to finalise the English language version. The latent structure, internal consistency, interrater agreement, and convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated with data from a convenience sample, drawn from an existing research cohort, of 131 trauma exposed participants from the United Kingdom reporting past diagnosis for PTSD or who had screened positively for traumatic stress symptoms. A range of self-report measures evaluating depression, panic, insomnia, dissociation, emotion dysregulation, negative cognitions about self, interpersonal functioning and general wellbeing were completed. Confirmatory factor analysis supported an adjusted second-order two-factor model of PTSD and disturbances in self-organisation (DSO) symptoms, allowing affect dysregulation to also load onto the PTSD factor, over alternative models. The ITI scores showed acceptable internal consistency, and interrater reliability was strong. Findings for convergent and discriminant validity were mostly as predicted for PTSD and DSO domains. Correlations with the ITQ were good but coefficients for the level of agreement of PTSD diagnosis and CPTSD diagnosis between the ITI and the ITQ were weaker, and item level agreement was variable. Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the ITI as a measure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Final revisions of the ITI are described.
国际创伤访谈(ITI)是一种由临床医生实施的结构化测评工具,旨在评估《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)中定义的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)。本研究旨在对ITI进行心理测量学评估并完成其英文版本。利用从一个现有的研究队列中抽取的便利样本数据,对131名来自英国的有创伤经历且报告过去被诊断为PTSD或创伤应激症状筛查呈阳性的参与者进行了潜在结构、内部一致性、评分者间一致性以及聚合效度和区分效度的评估。参与者还完成了一系列评估抑郁、惊恐、失眠、解离、情绪失调、对自我的负面认知、人际功能和总体幸福感的自我报告测量。验证性因素分析支持了一个调整后的二阶双因素模型,该模型包括PTSD症状和自我组织障碍(DSO)症状,相比其他模型,允许情感失调也加载到PTSD因素上。ITI得分显示出可接受的内部一致性,评分者间信度较强。PTSD和DSO领域的聚合效度和区分效度结果大多与预期一致。与ITQ的相关性良好,但ITI与ITQ之间PTSD诊断和CPTSD诊断的一致性水平系数较弱,且项目水平的一致性存在差异。研究结果为ITI作为ICD - 11中PTSD和CPTSD测量工具的信度和效度提供了支持。文中描述了ITI的最终修订内容。