• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语调与语用充实:语调如何限制临时等级推理

Intonation and Pragmatic Enrichment: How Intonation Constrains Ad Hoc Scalar Inferences.

作者信息

Tomlinson John M, Gotzner Nicole, Bott Lewis

机构信息

Leibniz Zentrum für Allegmeine Sprachwissenschaft, (ZAS), Berlin, Germany.

Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):200-223. doi: 10.1177/0023830917716101.

DOI:10.1177/0023830917716101
PMID:28697695
Abstract

Pragmatic inferences require listeners to use alternatives to arrive at the speaker's intended meaning. Previous research has shown that intonation interacts with alternatives but not how it does so. We present two mouse tracking experiments that test how pitch accents affect the processing of ad hoc scalar implicatures in English. The first shows that L+H* accents facilitate implicatures relative to H* accents. The second replicates this finding and demonstrates that the facilitation is caused by early derivation of the implicature in the L+H* condition. We attribute the effect to a link between L+H* and pragmatic considerations, such as speaker knowledge effects, or the saliency of alternatives relevant to the computation of implicatures. More generally our findings illustrate how intonation interacts at a cognitive level with pragmatic inference.

摘要

语用推理要求听众运用替代选项来理解说话者的意图。先前的研究表明语调与替代选项相互作用,但未阐明其具体方式。我们进行了两项鼠标追踪实验,以测试音高重音如何影响英语中临时等级含义的处理。第一项实验表明,相对于H重音,L+H重音促进了含义推导。第二项实验重复了这一发现,并表明这种促进作用是由L+H条件下含义的早期推导引起的。我们将这种效应归因于L+H与语用因素之间的联系,例如说话者的知识效应,或与含义计算相关的替代选项的显著性。更普遍地说,我们的研究结果说明了语调在认知层面上如何与语用推理相互作用。

相似文献

1
Intonation and Pragmatic Enrichment: How Intonation Constrains Ad Hoc Scalar Inferences.语调与语用充实:语调如何限制临时等级推理
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):200-223. doi: 10.1177/0023830917716101.
2
Processing Intonationally Implicated Contrast versus Negation in American English.处理美式英语中语调暗示的对比与否定
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):174-199. doi: 10.1177/0023830917694066.
3
When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.当音高重音编码说话者的承诺:来自法语语调的证据。
Lang Speech. 2016 Jun;59(Pt 2):266-93. doi: 10.1177/0023830915587337.
4
Postfocal Downstep in German.德语中的焦点后降调。
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):260-288. doi: 10.1177/0023830916647204. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
5
Intonation and Evidentiality in Spanish Polar Interrogatives.西班牙语极性疑问句中的语调与证据性
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):224-241. doi: 10.1177/0023830917698178.
6
Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.在说话者的音域内感知音高位置:基频、嗓音质量和说话者性别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1100-12. doi: 10.1121/1.4714351.
7
The role of tonal onglides in German nuclear pitch accents.德语核心音高重音中声调滑音的作用。
Lang Speech. 2015 Mar;58(Pt 1):114-28. doi: 10.1177/0023830914565688.
8
Are scalar implicatures automatically processed and different for each individual? A mismatch negativity (MMN) study.量级含义是自动处理的且因人而异吗?一项失匹配负波(MMN)研究。
Brain Res. 2015 Mar 2;1599:137-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.049. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
9
Introduction to the Special Section: Intonational constraints on pragmatic inferences.特刊引言:语调对语用推理的限制
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):171-173. doi: 10.1177/0023830917706725.
10
Experimental Evidence for the Role of Intonation in Evidential Marking.语调在证据标记中作用的实验证据
Lang Speech. 2017 Jun;60(2):242-259. doi: 10.1177/0023830917694920.

引用本文的文献

1
Higher-Order Logical Reasoning in Preschool Children: Evidence from Intonation and Quantifier Scope.学龄前儿童的高阶逻辑推理:来自语调与量词辖域的证据
Open Res Eur. 2025 Feb 3;5:34. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18312.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Intonational production as a window into children's early pragmatic competence: The case of the Norwegian polarity focus and two particles.语调产出作为洞察儿童早期语用能力的窗口:以挪威语极性焦点和两个小品词为例。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 11;14:1116842. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116842. eCollection 2023.
3
Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences.
利用选择的动态监测来预测和理解风险偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 15;117(50):31738-31747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010056117. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
4
Doing psychological science by hand.手工开展心理学研究。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct;27(5):315-323. doi: 10.1177/0963721417746793. Epub 2018 Aug 13.