Suppr超能文献

容量保证通气联合两种不同模式对早产儿的影响。

Effects of Volume Guaranteed Ventilation Combined with Two Different Modes in Preterm Infants.

作者信息

Unal Sezin, Ergenekon Ebru, Aktas Selma, Altuntas Nilgun, Beken Serdar, Kazanci Ebru, Kulali Ferit, Gulbahar Ozlem, Hirfanoglu Ibrahim M, Onal Esra, Turkyilmaz Canan, Koc Esin, Atalay Yildiz

机构信息

Gazi University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Neonatology, Etlik Zubeyde Hanım Women's Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2017 Dec;62(12):1525-1532. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05513. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Volume-controlled ventilation modes have been shown to reduce duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of chronic lung disease, failure of primary mode of ventilation, hypocarbia, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, pneumothorax, and periventricular leukomalacia in preterm infants when compared with pressure limited ventilation modes. Volume-guarantee (VG) ventilation is the most commonly used mode for volume-controlled ventilation. Assist control, pressure-support ventilation (PSV), and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) can be combined with VG; however, there is a lack of knowledge on the superiority of each regarding clinical outcomes. Therefore, we investigated the effects of SIMV+VG and PSV+VG on ventilatory parameters, pulmonary inflammation, morbidity, and mortality in preterm infants.

METHODS

Preterm infants who were born in our hospital between 24-32 weeks gestation and needed mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome were considered eligible. Patients requiring high-frequency oscillatory ventilation for primary treatment were excluded. Subjects were randomized to either SIMV+VG or PSV+VG. Continuously recorded ventilatory parameters, clinical data, blood gas values, and tracheal aspirate cytokine levels were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 42 subjects. Clinical data were similar between groups. PSV+VG delivered closer tidal volumes to set tidal volumes (60% vs 49%, = .02). Clinical data, including days on ventilation, morbidity, and mortality, were similar between groups. Chronic lung disease occurred less often and heart rate was lower in subjects who were ventilated with PSV+VG. The incidence of hypocarbia and hypercarbia were similar. Interleukin-1β in the tracheal aspirates increased during both modes.

CONCLUSION

PSV+VG provided closer tidal volumes to the set value in ventilated preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome and was not associated with overventilation or a difference in mortality or morbidity when compared to SIMV+VG. Therefore, PSV+VG is a safe mode of mechanical ventilation to be used for respiratory distress syndrome.

摘要

背景

与压力限制通气模式相比,容量控制通气模式已被证明可减少早产儿机械通气时间、慢性肺病发生率、初始通气模式失败率、低碳酸血症、重度脑室内出血、气胸和脑室周围白质软化症的发生率。容量保证(VG)通气是容量控制通气最常用的模式。辅助控制、压力支持通气(PSV)和同步间歇指令通气(SIMV)可与VG联合使用;然而,对于每种模式在临床结局方面的优越性缺乏了解。因此,我们研究了SIMV+VG和PSV+VG对早产儿通气参数、肺部炎症、发病率和死亡率的影响。

方法

孕周在24-32周之间、因呼吸窘迫综合征需要机械通气且在我院出生的早产儿被认为符合条件。排除需要高频振荡通气进行初始治疗的患者。将受试者随机分为SIMV+VG组或PSV+VG组。对连续记录的通气参数、临床数据、血气值和气管吸出物细胞因子水平进行分析。

结果

该研究纳入了42名受试者。两组之间的临床数据相似。PSV+VG组输送的潮气量更接近设定潮气量(60%对49%,P =.02)。两组之间的临床数据,包括通气天数、发病率和死亡率相似。接受PSV+VG通气的受试者慢性肺病发生率较低,心率也较低。低碳酸血症和高碳酸血症的发生率相似。两种模式下气管吸出物中的白细胞介素-1β均升高。

结论

在患有呼吸窘迫综合征的通气早产儿中,PSV+VG提供的潮气量更接近设定值,与SIMV+VG相比,不伴有通气过度或死亡率及发病率差异。因此,PSV+VG是用于呼吸窘迫综合征的一种安全的机械通气模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验