Karamitros Georgios A, Kitsos Nikolaos A, Sapountzis Stamatis
Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 Dec;41(6):1426-1434. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0937-5. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
An increasing number of patients, considering aesthetic surgery, use Internet health information as their first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on phalloplasty is currently unknown. This study aimed to assess the quality of patient information on phalloplasty available in the Internet.
The assessment of the Web sites was based on the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) instrument (36 items). Three hundred Web sites were identified by the most popular Web search engines.
Ninety Web sites were assessed after, duplicates, irrelevant sources and Web sites in other languages rather than English were excluded. Only 16 (18%) Web sites addressed >21 items, and scores tended to be higher for Web sites developed by academic centers and the industry than for Web sites developed by private practicing surgeons. The EQIP score achieved by Web sites ranged between 4 and 29 of the total 36 points, with a median value of 17.5 points (interquartile range, 13-21). The top 5 Web sites with the highest scores were identified.
The quality of patient information on phalloplasty in the Internet is substandard, and the existing Web sites present inadequate information. There is a dire need to improve the quality of Internet phalloplasty resources for potential patients who might consider this procedure.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
越来越多考虑美容手术的患者将互联网健康信息作为他们的首要信息来源。然而,目前尚不清楚互联网上有关阴茎成形术的信息质量如何。本研究旨在评估互联网上可得的阴茎成形术患者信息的质量。
基于改良的患者质量信息保障(EQIP)工具(36项)对网站进行评估。通过最流行的网络搜索引擎识别出300个网站。
排除重复、不相关来源以及非英语的其他语言网站后,对90个网站进行了评估。只有16个(18%)网站涉及超过21项内容,学术中心和行业开发的网站得分往往高于私人执业外科医生开发的网站。网站的EQIP得分在总分36分中的范围为4至29分,中位数为17.5分(四分位间距,13 - 21)。确定了得分最高的前5个网站。
互联网上阴茎成形术患者信息的质量不合格,现有网站提供的信息不足。对于可能考虑该手术的潜在患者,迫切需要提高互联网阴茎成形术资源的质量。
证据水平IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。