Schiefer Jan, Amthauer Holger, Genseke Philipp, Mertens Peter R, Chatzikyrkou Christos
University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
University Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Magdeburg, Germany.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Oct;49(10):1823-1833. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1656-1. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
In patients with resistant hypertension and large blood pressure fluctuations, the role of orthostatic hypertension, associated with position-dependent renal perfusion disturbances, has not been investigated in detail yet.
In this regard, four patients from our outpatient clinic were investigated by the use of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), active standing test, renal duplex sonography and Tc99m-mercaptoacetyltriglycine [MAG3] renal scintigraphy in supine and upright position.
Four patients (three males and one female; 51-79 years) with a mean of 4.25 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic were evaluated. The recorded blood pressure fluctuations were up to 89/58-198/121 mmHg. Three patients exhibited an extreme and one a normal dipping pattern in the 24-h ABPM. Three patients demonstrated a hypertensive orthostatic reaction in the active standing test. By duplex sonography, a bilateral decrease in the overall intrarenal resistive indices was shown in two patients, a unilateral overall decrease in one patient and a localized decrease in the last patient. From a morphological standpoint of view, all patients had a normal anatomical position and a physiologic descent of both kidneys. But the normalized tubular extraction rate was pathologic in all patients in the upright body position and normalized when lying down in three patients.
Position-dependent renal perfusion should be considered in patients with large blood pressure fluctuations and extreme dipping. If morphological imaging shows no abnormalities, functional imaging provides additional information. Further investigation is needed, foremost if nephropexy could improve blood pressure control in some of these patients.
在顽固性高血压和血压大幅波动的患者中,与体位依赖性肾灌注紊乱相关的直立性高血压的作用尚未得到详细研究。
在这方面,对我们门诊的4例患者进行了研究,采用24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)、主动站立试验、肾脏双功超声检查以及仰卧位和直立位的Tc99m-巯基乙酰三甘氨酸[MAG3]肾闪烁显像。
评估了4例患者(3例男性和1例女性;年龄51 - 79岁),平均使用4.25种抗高血压药物,其中包括一种利尿剂。记录到的血压波动高达89/58 - 198/121 mmHg。24小时ABPM中,3例患者呈现极端的血压波动模式,1例为正常的血压波动模式。3例患者在主动站立试验中表现出高血压直立反应。通过双功超声检查,2例患者双侧肾内总阻力指数降低,1例患者单侧总阻力指数降低,最后1例患者局部阻力指数降低。从形态学角度来看,所有患者双肾的解剖位置正常且有生理性下降。但所有患者在直立位时标准化肾小管提取率均异常,3例患者在卧位时恢复正常。
血压大幅波动和极端血压波动模式的患者应考虑体位依赖性肾灌注。如果形态学成像未显示异常,功能成像可提供额外信息。需要进一步研究,尤其是肾固定术是否能改善部分此类患者的血压控制。