Suppr超能文献

使用间歇性导尿术患者的生活质量

Quality of life of patients using intermittent urinary catheterization.

作者信息

Fumincelli Laís, Mazzo Alessandra, Martins José Carlos Amado, Henriques Fernando Manuel Dias, Orlandin Leonardo

机构信息

Doctoral student, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Scholarship holder at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil.

PhD, Associate Professor, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Jul 10;25:e2906. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1816.2906.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

measure and compare the quality of life of neurogenic bladder patients using intermittent urinary catheterization who were going through rehabilitation in Brazil and Portugal.

METHOD

multicenter, quantitative, cross-sectional, observational-analytic and correlational study executed in Brazil and Portugal. Two data collection tools were used, being one questionnaire with sociodemographic and clinical data and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-bref. Patients were included who were over 18 years of age, suffering from neurogenic urinary bladder and using intermittent urinary catheterization.

RESULTS

in the sample of Brazilian (n = 170) and Portuguese (n = 52) patients, respectively, most patients were single (87-51.2%; 25-48.1%), had finished primary education (47-45.3%; 31-59.6%) and were retired (70-41.2%; 21-40.4%). Spinal cord injury was the main cause of using the urinary catheter in both countries. The Brazilian patients presented higher mean quality of life scores in the psychological domain (68.9) and lower scores in the physical domain (58.9). The Portuguese patients presented higher scores in the psychological domain (68.4) and lower scores in the environment domain (59.4). The execution of intermittent urinary self-catheterization was significant for both countries.

CONCLUSIONS

in the two countries, these patients' quality of life can be determined by the improvement in the urinary symptoms, independence, self-confidence, social relationships and access to work activities.

摘要

目的

测量并比较在巴西和葡萄牙接受康复治疗的使用间歇性导尿的神经源性膀胱患者的生活质量。

方法

在巴西和葡萄牙开展的多中心、定量、横断面、观察分析和相关性研究。使用了两种数据收集工具,一种是包含社会人口统计学和临床数据的问卷,以及世界卫生组织生活质量简表。纳入年龄超过18岁、患有神经源性膀胱且使用间歇性导尿的患者。

结果

在巴西(n = 170)和葡萄牙(n = 52)患者样本中,大多数患者为单身(巴西87例,占51.2%;葡萄牙25例,占48.1%),完成了小学教育(巴西47例,占45.3%;葡萄牙31例,占59.6%)且已退休(巴西70例,占41.2%;葡萄牙21例,占40.4%)。脊髓损伤是两国使用导尿管的主要原因。巴西患者在心理领域的平均生活质量得分较高(68.9),而在身体领域得分较低(58.9)。葡萄牙患者在心理领域得分较高(68.4),在环境领域得分较低(59.4)。两国间歇性自我导尿的实施情况均具有显著性。

结论

在这两个国家,这些患者的生活质量可通过改善泌尿症状、独立性、自信心、社会关系以及参与工作活动的机会来确定。

相似文献

1
Quality of life of patients using intermittent urinary catheterization.使用间歇性导尿术患者的生活质量
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Jul 10;25:e2906. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1816.2906.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验