Fumincelli Laís, Mazzo Alessandra, Martins José Carlos Amado, Henriques Fernando Manuel Dias, Orlandin Leonardo
Doctoral student, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Scholarship holder at Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Brazil.
PhD, Associate Professor, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Jul 10;25:e2906. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1816.2906.
measure and compare the quality of life of neurogenic bladder patients using intermittent urinary catheterization who were going through rehabilitation in Brazil and Portugal.
multicenter, quantitative, cross-sectional, observational-analytic and correlational study executed in Brazil and Portugal. Two data collection tools were used, being one questionnaire with sociodemographic and clinical data and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-bref. Patients were included who were over 18 years of age, suffering from neurogenic urinary bladder and using intermittent urinary catheterization.
in the sample of Brazilian (n = 170) and Portuguese (n = 52) patients, respectively, most patients were single (87-51.2%; 25-48.1%), had finished primary education (47-45.3%; 31-59.6%) and were retired (70-41.2%; 21-40.4%). Spinal cord injury was the main cause of using the urinary catheter in both countries. The Brazilian patients presented higher mean quality of life scores in the psychological domain (68.9) and lower scores in the physical domain (58.9). The Portuguese patients presented higher scores in the psychological domain (68.4) and lower scores in the environment domain (59.4). The execution of intermittent urinary self-catheterization was significant for both countries.
in the two countries, these patients' quality of life can be determined by the improvement in the urinary symptoms, independence, self-confidence, social relationships and access to work activities.
测量并比较在巴西和葡萄牙接受康复治疗的使用间歇性导尿的神经源性膀胱患者的生活质量。
在巴西和葡萄牙开展的多中心、定量、横断面、观察分析和相关性研究。使用了两种数据收集工具,一种是包含社会人口统计学和临床数据的问卷,以及世界卫生组织生活质量简表。纳入年龄超过18岁、患有神经源性膀胱且使用间歇性导尿的患者。
在巴西(n = 170)和葡萄牙(n = 52)患者样本中,大多数患者为单身(巴西87例,占51.2%;葡萄牙25例,占48.1%),完成了小学教育(巴西47例,占45.3%;葡萄牙31例,占59.6%)且已退休(巴西70例,占41.2%;葡萄牙21例,占40.4%)。脊髓损伤是两国使用导尿管的主要原因。巴西患者在心理领域的平均生活质量得分较高(68.9),而在身体领域得分较低(58.9)。葡萄牙患者在心理领域得分较高(68.4),在环境领域得分较低(59.4)。两国间歇性自我导尿的实施情况均具有显著性。
在这两个国家,这些患者的生活质量可通过改善泌尿症状、独立性、自信心、社会关系以及参与工作活动的机会来确定。