Feigelman William, Feigelman Beverly, Kawashima Daisuke, Shiraga Keisuke, Kawano Kenji
1 Nassau Community College, NY, New York, USA.
2 Adelphi University School of Social Work, NY, USA.
Omega (Westport). 2017 Aug;75(3):219-229. doi: 10.1177/0030222816652799. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
A total of 56 Japanese and 59 American survivor of suicide support group facilitators were asked to rank the mutual aid objectives of their groups following Shulman's scheme in terms of their frequency and importance. Both American and Japanese facilitators showed an emphasis on personal adaptation goals (such as helping bereaved feel less isolated in their grief or encouraging bereaved to share their coping with loss experiences) over collective goals (such as raising monies for more research on mental illness or trying to combat societal suicide stigma in their local communities). Differences were also noted with American facilitators evaluating helping with problem solving, sharing different ways of coping, viewing personal issues as societal problems, and advocating for promoting social change as significantly higher than the Japanese did. We believe some of these contrasts reflect differences in American and Japanese cultural values.
56名日本和59名美国自杀幸存者互助小组的主持人被要求按照舒尔曼的方案,根据互助目标出现的频率和重要性对各自小组的互助目标进行排序。美国和日本的主持人都更强调个人适应目标(比如帮助遗属在悲痛中减少孤独感,或鼓励遗属分享应对丧亲之痛的经历),而非集体目标(比如筹集资金用于更多精神疾病研究,或在当地社区努力消除社会对自杀的污名化)。研究还发现,美国主持人对解决问题、分享不同应对方式、将个人问题视为社会问题以及倡导推动社会变革等方面的评价显著高于日本主持人。我们认为其中一些差异反映了美日文化价值观的不同。