Simner Patricia J, Opene Belita N A, Chambers Krizia K, Naumann Matthew E, Carroll Karen C, Tamma Pranita D
Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Department of Pathology, Division of Medical Microbiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Sep;55(9):2858-2864. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00775-17. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
Accurate detection of carbapenemase-producing glucose-nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (CPNFs), including and , is necessary to prevent their dissemination within health care settings. We performed a method comparison study of 11 phenotypic carbapenemase detection assays to evaluate their accuracy for the detection of CPNFs. A total of 96 carbapenem-resistant glucose-nonfermenting isolates were included, of which 29% produced carbapenemases. All CPNFs were molecularly characterized to identify β-lactamase genes. A total of 86% of the carbapenemase-producing isolates produced class B carbapenemases. Several assays performed with a sensitivity of >90% for the detection of carbapenemase-producing , including all rapid chromogenic assays and the modified carbapenem inactivation method. Most included assays, with the exception of the Manual Blue Carba assay, the Modified Carba NP assay, the boronic acid synergy test, and the metallo-β-lactamase Etest, had specificities of >90% for detecting carbapenemase-producing Class D carbapenemases were the most prevalent carbapenemases among the carbapenemase-producing strains, with 60% of the carbapenemase-producing isolates producing acquired OXA-type carbapenemases. Although several assays achieved >90% specificity in identifying carbapenemase-producing , no assays achieved a sensitivity of greater than 90%. Our findings suggest that the available phenotypic tests generally appear to have excellent sensitivity and specificity for detecting carbapenemase-producing isolates. However, further modifications to existing assays or novel assays may be necessary to accurately detect carbapenemase-producing .
准确检测产碳青霉烯酶的非发酵革兰氏阴性菌(CPNFs),包括[具体菌名1]和[具体菌名2],对于防止它们在医疗机构内传播至关重要。我们对11种表型碳青霉烯酶检测方法进行了方法比较研究,以评估它们检测CPNFs的准确性。共纳入了96株耐碳青霉烯的非发酵菌分离株,其中29%产生碳青霉烯酶。所有CPNFs都进行了分子特征分析以鉴定β-内酰胺酶基因。产碳青霉烯酶的[具体菌名1]分离株中,共有86%产生B类碳青霉烯酶。几种检测方法对产碳青霉烯酶的[具体菌名1]检测灵敏度>90%,包括所有快速显色检测方法和改良碳青霉烯灭活方法。除手工蓝卡巴检测、改良卡巴NP检测、硼酸协同试验和金属β-内酰胺酶Etest外,大多数纳入的检测方法对产碳青霉烯酶的[具体菌名2]的特异性>90%。D类碳青霉烯酶是产碳青霉烯酶的[具体菌名2]菌株中最常见的碳青霉烯酶,产碳青霉烯酶 的分离株中有60%产生获得性OXA型碳青霉烯酶。虽然几种检测方法在鉴定产碳青霉烯酶的[具体菌名2]时特异性>90%,但没有一种检测方法的灵敏度大于90%。我们的研究结果表明,现有的表型检测方法通常对检测产碳青霉烯酶的分离株具有出色的灵敏度和特异性。然而,可能需要对现有检测方法进行进一步改进或开发新的检测方法,以准确检测产碳青霉烯酶的[具体菌名2]。