Viau Roberto, Frank Karen M, Jacobs Michael R, Wilson Brigid, Kaye Keith, Donskey Curtis J, Perez Federico, Endimiani Andrea, Bonomo Robert A
Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Microbiology Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Jan;29(1):1-27. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00108-14.
Carbapenemases have become a significant mechanism for broad-spectrum β-lactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and other Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp. Intestinal carriage of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs) is an important source of transmission. Isolation of carriers is one strategy that can be used to limit the spread of these bacteria. In this review, we critically examine the clinical performance, advantages, and disadvantages of methods available for the detection of intestinal carriage of CPOs. Culture-based methods (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] protocols, chromogenic media, specialized agars, and double-disk synergy tests) for detecting carriage of CPOs are convenient due to their ready availability and low cost, but their limited sensitivity and long turnaround time may not always be optimal for infection control practices. Contemporary nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs) such as real-time PCR, hybridization assays, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), or a combined culture and NAAT approach may provide fast results and/or added sensitivity and specificity compared with culture-based methods. Infection control practitioners and clinical microbiologists should be aware of the strengths and limitations of available methods to determine the most suitable approach for their medical facility to fit their infection control needs.
碳青霉烯酶已成为肠杆菌科细菌以及其他革兰氏阴性菌(如假单胞菌属和不动杆菌属)对广谱β-内酰胺类抗生素耐药的重要机制。产碳青霉烯酶生物体(CPOs)的肠道定植是重要的传播来源。隔离携带者是一种可用于限制这些细菌传播的策略。在本综述中,我们严格审视了可用于检测CPOs肠道定植的方法的临床性能、优缺点。基于培养的方法(疾病控制与预防中心[CDC]方案、显色培养基、专用琼脂和双盘协同试验)用于检测CPOs的定植,因其易于获得且成本低而方便,但它们有限的敏感性和较长的周转时间对于感染控制措施而言可能并非总是最佳选择。当代核酸扩增技术(NAATs),如实时PCR、杂交检测、环介导等温扩增(LAMP)或培养与NAAT联合方法,与基于培养的方法相比,可能会提供快速结果和/或更高的敏感性和特异性。感染控制从业人员和临床微生物学家应了解现有方法的优势和局限性,以确定最适合其医疗机构的方法,满足其感染控制需求。