Waris Otto, Soveri Anna, Ahti Miikka, Hoffing Russell C, Ventus Daniel, Jaeggi Susanne M, Seitz Aaron R, Laine Matti
Department of Psychology, Åbo Akademi UniversityTurku, Finland.
Turku Brain and Mind Center, University of TurkuTurku, Finland.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 28;8:1062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01062. eCollection 2017.
Working memory (WM) is a key cognitive system that is strongly related to other cognitive domains and relevant for everyday life. However, the structure of WM is yet to be determined. A number of WM models have been put forth especially by factor analytical studies. In broad terms, these models vary by their emphasis on WM contents (e.g., visuospatial, verbal) vs. WM processes (e.g., maintenance, updating) as critical, dissociable elements. Here we conducted confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses on a broad set of WM tasks, half of them numerical-verbal and half of them visuospatial, representing four commonly used task paradigms: simple span, complex span, running memory, and -back. The tasks were selected to allow the detection of both content-based (visuospatial, numerical-verbal) and process-based (maintenance, updating) divisions. The data were collected online which allowed the recruitment of a large and demographically diverse sample of adults ( = 711). Both factor analytical methods pointed to a clear division according to task content for all paradigms except -back, while there was no indication for a process-based division. Besides the content-based division, confirmatory factor analyses supported a model that also included a general WM factor. The -back tasks had the highest loadings on the general factor, suggesting that this factor reflected high-level cognitive resources such as executive functioning and fluid intelligence that are engaged with all WM tasks, and possibly even more so with the -back. Together with earlier findings that indicate high variability of process-based WM divisions, we conclude that the most robust division of WM is along its contents (visuospatial vs. numerical-verbal), rather than along its hypothetical subprocesses.
工作记忆(WM)是一个关键的认知系统,它与其他认知领域密切相关且对日常生活至关重要。然而,工作记忆的结构尚未确定。特别是通过因素分析研究已经提出了许多工作记忆模型。广义而言,这些模型在对工作记忆内容(如视觉空间、言语)与工作记忆过程(如维持、更新)作为关键的、可分离的要素的强调上有所不同。在这里,我们对一系列广泛的工作记忆任务进行了验证性和探索性因素分析,其中一半是数字 - 言语任务,一半是视觉空间任务,代表了四种常用的任务范式:简单跨度、复杂跨度、连续记忆和n-back。选择这些任务是为了能够检测基于内容(视觉空间、数字 - 言语)和基于过程(维持、更新)的划分。数据是在线收集的,这使得能够招募到大量且人口统计学上多样化的成年人样本(N = 711)。两种因素分析方法都表明,除了n-back范式外,所有范式都根据任务内容有明确的划分,而没有基于过程划分的迹象。除了基于内容的划分外,验证性因素分析支持了一个还包括一般工作记忆因素的模型。n-back任务在一般因素上的载荷最高,这表明该因素反映了高级认知资源,如执行功能和流体智力,这些资源参与了所有工作记忆任务,对于n-back任务可能更是如此。结合早期表明基于过程的工作记忆划分具有高度变异性的研究结果,我们得出结论,工作记忆最稳健的划分是基于其内容(视觉空间与数字 - 言语),而不是基于其假设的子过程。