Kosałka Katarzyna, Wachowska Ewelina, Słotwiński Robert
Department of Immunology, Biochemistry, and Nutrition, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
Prz Gastroenterol. 2017;12(2):73-82. doi: 10.5114/pg.2017.68165. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
The problem of diagnosing nutritional status disorders in septic patients remains unresolved. This is associated with the necessity of the introduction of newer and newer methods of assessing nutritional status, often requiring precise and expensive equipment as well as employment of professionals in this field in hospital wards, primarily including intensive care units (ICU). Methods that have been applied thus far for assessing nutritional status, also used in severely ill septic patients, have little impact on improving treatment results. This is due to the high dynamics of changes in nutritional status in these patients, healing process variability in individual patients, and the "mismatch" of methods for assessing nutritional status in relation to the patient's clinical status. The diagnostic value of the traditional methods of assessing nutritional status, i.e. anthropometric analysis and selected laboratory tests, as markers of nutritional status disorders in septic patients, is still debatable. There is still no precise method that could become the "gold standard" allowing for early identification of malnutrition in these group of patients. Phase angle, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA), and the "illness marker", obtained directly from the resistance, reactance, and impedance, can be used as prognostic or nutritional indices in severely ill septic patients, but the intensity of research on this subject needs to be increased. Detailed assessment of nutritional status should include tests of selected inflammation markers (including TLC, HMGB1, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1ra, sTNFRI).
脓毒症患者营养状况紊乱的诊断问题仍未得到解决。这与引入越来越新的营养状况评估方法的必要性有关,这些方法通常需要精密且昂贵的设备,还需要在医院病房,主要是重症监护病房(ICU)配备该领域的专业人员。迄今为止应用于评估营养状况的方法,也用于重症脓毒症患者,但对改善治疗效果影响甚微。这是由于这些患者营养状况变化动态性高、个体患者愈合过程存在差异以及营养状况评估方法与患者临床状况“不匹配”。传统的营养状况评估方法,即人体测量分析和某些实验室检查,作为脓毒症患者营养状况紊乱标志物的诊断价值仍存在争议。目前仍没有一种精确的方法能够成为早期识别这类患者营养不良的“金标准”。相位角、生物电阻抗矢量分析(BIVA)以及直接从电阻、电抗和阻抗得出的“疾病标志物”,可作为重症脓毒症患者的预后或营养指标,但对此主题的研究力度仍需加大。营养状况的详细评估应包括某些炎症标志物的检测(包括淋巴细胞总数、高迁移率族蛋白B1、白细胞介素 - 6、白细胞介素 - 10、白细胞介素 - 1受体拮抗剂、可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体I)。