Budukh Atul, Palayekar Vrushali, Maheshwari Amita, Deodhar Kedar, Purwar Pallavi, Bagal Sonali, Vadigoppula Ashok, Lokhande Manoj, Panse Nandkumar, Dikshit Rajesh, Badwe Rajendra
Tata Memorial Centre.
National Institute for Research and Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Mumbai.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Nov;27(6):546-552. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000387.
In the rural areas of India, women generally use a piece of old cloth as a menstrual device. The aim of this study was to detect human papilloma virus (HPV) from menstrual blood on the menstrual pad and assess whether this could be a useful screening tool for cervical cancer. In Jamkhed area of rural Maharashtra, (population A), we collected menstrual pads from women who provided consent in the 30-50 year age group. The women who had provided menstrual pads underwent HC2 testing. We standardized the method for extracting DNA by PCR from the menstrual pad. The women who tested HPV positive, on the basis of HC2/PCR testing, underwent colposcopy. In the rural population of Pune area of Maharashtra state (population B), menstrual pads were collected. HPV was tested using the PCR method. HPV-positive women and a few HPV-negative women, selected randomly, underwent colposcopy and HC2 testing. In population A, 164 women provided their used menstrual pads and also underwent an HC2 screening test. Of these, six (3.2%) cases were reported as HPV positive. In population B, 365 women provided their used menstrual pads for HPV testing, of which 18 (4.9%) cases were diagnosed as HPV positive. The women who tested HPV positive, on the basis of PCR testing, and 10% randomly selected HPV-negative cases (37) and 18 women who voluntary requested testing underwent colposcopy and HC2 testing. The sensitivity of menstrual pad HPV testing compared with gold standard HC2 testing was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.97], 67% (95% CI: 0.30-0.91) and specificity was 99% (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), 88% (95% CI: 0.77-0.94) in population A and population B, respectively. The sensitivity of diagnosing CIN lesion was 83% (95% CI: 0.44-0.97) and specificity was 95% (95% CI: 0.91-0.97). On the basis of the sensitivity and specificity results, and the completely noninvasive, simple and convenient method of detecting HPV, menstrual pad might be considered a cervical cancer screening tool in rural Indian women.
在印度农村地区,女性通常使用一块旧布作为经期用品。本研究的目的是从月经垫上的经血中检测人乳头瘤病毒(HPV),并评估这是否可作为宫颈癌的一种有用筛查工具。在马哈拉施特拉邦农村的贾姆赫德地区(A人群),我们从年龄在30至50岁、且提供了知情同意书的女性中收集月经垫。提供了月经垫的女性接受了第二代杂交捕获试验(HC2)检测。我们对通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)从月经垫中提取DNA的方法进行了标准化。根据HC2/PCR检测结果HPV呈阳性的女性接受了阴道镜检查。在马哈拉施特拉邦浦那地区的农村人口(B人群)中,收集了月经垫。使用PCR方法检测HPV。随机选择HPV阳性女性和少数HPV阴性女性接受阴道镜检查和HC2检测。在A人群中,164名女性提供了她们用过的月经垫并接受了HC2筛查检测。其中,有6例(3.2%)被报告为HPV阳性。在B人群中,365名女性提供了她们用过的月经垫用于HPV检测,其中18例(4.9%)被诊断为HPV阳性。根据PCR检测结果HPV呈阳性的女性、随机选择的10%HPV阴性病例(37例)以及18名自愿要求检测的女性接受了阴道镜检查和HC2检测。与金标准HC2检测相比,月经垫HPV检测在A人群和B人群中的灵敏度分别为83%[95%置信区间(CI):0.47 - 0.97]、67%(95%CI:0.30 - 0.91),特异性分别为99%(95%CI:0.96 - 0.99)、88%(95%CI:0.77 - 0.94)。诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)病变的灵敏度为83%(95%CI:0.44 - 0.97),特异性为95%(95%CI:0.91 - 0.97)。基于灵敏度和特异性结果,以及检测HPV的完全无创、简单便捷的方法,月经垫可被视为印度农村女性宫颈癌的一种筛查工具。