Wang Fei, Wang Xinhe, Orrú Christina D, Groveman Bradley R, Surewicz Krystyna, Abskharon Romany, Imamura Morikazu, Yokoyama Takashi, Kim Yong-Sun, Vander Stel Kayla J, Sinniah Kumar, Priola Suzette A, Surewicz Witold K, Caughey Byron, Ma Jiyan
Center for Neurodegenerative Science, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States of America.
Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America.
PLoS Pathog. 2017 Jul 12;13(7):e1006491. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006491. eCollection 2017 Jul.
Prions, characterized by self-propagating protease-resistant prion protein (PrP) conformations, are agents causing prion disease. Recent studies generated several such self-propagating protease-resistant recombinant PrP (rPrP-res) conformers. While some cause prion disease, others fail to induce any pathology. Here we showed that although distinctly different, the pathogenic and non-pathogenic rPrP-res conformers were similarly recognized by a group of conformational antibodies against prions and shared a similar guanidine hydrochloride denaturation profile, suggesting a similar overall architecture. Interestingly, two independently generated non-pathogenic rPrP-res were almost identical, indicating that the particular rPrP-res resulted from cofactor-guided PrP misfolding, rather than stochastic PrP aggregation. Consistent with the notion that cofactors influence rPrP-res conformation, the propagation of all rPrP-res formed with phosphatidylglycerol/RNA was cofactor-dependent, which is different from rPrP-res generated with a single cofactor, phosphatidylethanolamine. Unexpectedly, despite the dramatic difference in disease-causing capability, RT-QuIC assays detected large increases in seeding activity in both pathogenic and non-pathogenic rPrP-res inoculated mice, indicating that the non-pathogenic rPrP-res is not completely inert in vivo. Together, our study supported a role of cofactors in guiding PrP misfolding, indicated that relatively small structural features determine rPrP-res' pathogenicity, and revealed that the in vivo seeding ability of rPrP-res does not necessarily result in pathogenicity.
朊病毒以自我传播的抗蛋白酶朊病毒蛋白(PrP)构象为特征,是引起朊病毒病的病原体。最近的研究产生了几种这样的自我传播的抗蛋白酶重组PrP(rPrP-res)构象异构体。虽然有些会导致朊病毒病,但其他的则不会引起任何病理变化。在这里,我们表明,尽管致病性和非致病性rPrP-res构象异构体明显不同,但它们被一组针对朊病毒的构象抗体同样识别,并且具有相似的盐酸胍变性曲线,这表明它们具有相似的整体结构。有趣的是,两个独立产生的非致病性rPrP-res几乎相同,这表明特定的rPrP-res是由辅因子引导的PrP错误折叠产生的,而不是随机的PrP聚集。与辅因子影响rPrP-res构象的观点一致,所有由磷脂酰甘油/RNA形成的rPrP-res的传播都依赖于辅因子,这与由单一辅因子磷脂酰乙醇胺产生的rPrP-res不同。出乎意料的是,尽管致病能力存在巨大差异,但RT-QuIC分析检测到接种致病性和非致病性rPrP-res的小鼠的种子活性都大幅增加,这表明非致病性rPrP-res在体内并非完全无活性。总之,我们的研究支持了辅因子在引导PrP错误折叠中的作用,表明相对较小的结构特征决定了rPrP-res的致病性,并揭示了rPrP-res的体内种子接种能力不一定导致致病性。