Goldstein Evan V
Division of Health Services Management & Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Jul 12;5(3):32. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030032.
Individuals with mental health disorders often die decades earlier than the average person, and low-income individuals disproportionately experience limited access to necessary services. In 2014, the U.S. Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) leveraged Affordable Care Act funds to address these challenges through behavioral health integration. The objective of this study is to assess the US$55 million program's first-year impact on access and cost. This analysis uses multivariable difference-in-difference regression models to estimate changes in outcomes between the original 219 Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) Behavioral Health Integration grantees and two comparison groups. The primary outcome variables are annual depression screening rate, percentage of mental health and substance use patients served, and per capita cost. The results change when comparing the Behavioral Health Integration (BHI) grantees to a propensity score-matched comparison group versus comparing the grantees to the full population of health centers. After one year of implementation, the grant program appeared ineffective as measured by this study's outcomes, though costs did not significantly rise because of the program. This study has limitations that must be discussed, including non-randomized study design, FQHC data measurement, and BHI program design consequences. Time will tell if FQHC-based behavioral-physical health care integration will improve access among low-income, medically-underserved populations.
患有精神健康障碍的人往往比普通人早几十年死亡,而且低收入人群获得必要服务的机会极为有限。2014年,美国卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)利用《平价医疗法案》的资金,通过行为健康整合来应对这些挑战。本研究的目的是评估这个5500万美元项目在第一年对服务可及性和成本的影响。该分析使用多变量差分回归模型来估计最初的219家获得联邦资格认定的健康中心(FQHC)行为健康整合受助机构与两个对照组之间的结果变化。主要结果变量是年度抑郁症筛查率、接受服务的精神健康和药物使用患者的百分比以及人均成本。将行为健康整合(BHI)受助机构与倾向得分匹配的对照组进行比较,与将受助机构与所有健康中心的总体进行比较时,结果有所不同。实施一年后,从本研究的结果衡量来看,该资助项目似乎没有效果,不过该项目并未导致成本显著上升。本研究存在一些必须讨论的局限性,包括非随机研究设计、FQHC数据测量以及BHI项目设计的影响。基于FQHC的行为-身体健康护理整合能否改善低收入、医疗服务不足人群的服务可及性,时间会给出答案。