Suppr超能文献

改善临床研究中的选址:一种标准化、客观的多步骤方法及初步经验结果

Improving site selection in clinical studies: a standardised, objective, multistep method and first experience results.

作者信息

Hurtado-Chong Anahí, Joeris Alexander, Hess Denise, Blauth Michael

机构信息

AOClinical Investigation and Documentation (AOCID), AO Foundation, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e014796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014796.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A considerable number of clinical studies experience delays, which result in increased duration and costs. In multicentre studies, patient recruitment is among the leading causes of delays. Poor site selection can result in low recruitment and bad data quality. Site selection is therefore crucial for study quality and completion, but currently no specific guidelines are available.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Selection of sites adequate to participate in a prospective multicentre cohort study was performed through an open call using a newly developed objective multistep approach. The method is based on use of a network, definition of objective criteria and a systematic screening process.

ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF THE METHOD AT WORK

Out of 266 interested sites, 24 were shortlisted and finally 12 sites were selected to participate in the study. The steps in the process included an open call through a network, use of selection questionnaires tailored to the study, evaluation of responses using objective criteria and scripted telephone interviews. At each step, the number of candidate sites was quickly reduced leaving only the most promising candidates. Recruitment and quality of data went according to expectations in spite of the contracting problems faced with some sites.

CONCLUSION

The results of our first experience with a standardised and objective method of site selection are encouraging. The site selection method described here can serve as a guideline for other researchers performing multicentre studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581.

摘要

引言

大量临床研究出现延误,这导致研究时长增加和成本上升。在多中心研究中,患者招募是延误的主要原因之一。不佳的研究地点选择可能导致招募人数少和数据质量差。因此,研究地点的选择对于研究质量和完成情况至关重要,但目前尚无具体指南。

材料与方法

通过公开招募,采用新开发的客观多步骤方法来选择适合参与一项前瞻性多中心队列研究的地点。该方法基于网络的使用、客观标准的定义以及系统的筛选过程。

该方法实际应用的示例

在266个感兴趣的地点中,24个被列入候选名单,最终12个地点被选中参与研究。该过程中的步骤包括通过网络进行公开招募、使用针对该研究量身定制的筛选问卷、使用客观标准评估回复以及进行脚本化电话访谈。在每个步骤中,候选地点的数量迅速减少,只留下最有前景的候选者。尽管一些地点面临合同问题,但招募情况和数据质量均符合预期。

结论

我们首次使用标准化、客观的地点选择方法所获得的结果令人鼓舞。此处描述的地点选择方法可为其他进行多中心研究的研究人员提供指导。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02297581。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f92/5734283/74936a75f9bd/bmjopen-2016-014796f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验