Suppr超能文献

创伤后可回收下腔静脉滤器的静脉血栓形成、血栓栓塞和机械并发症。

Venous thrombotic, thromboembolic, and mechanical complications after retrievable inferior vena cava filters for major trauma.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):63-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu195. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ideal thromboprophylaxis in patients at risk of bleeding is uncertain. This retrospective cohort study assessed the risk factors for complications after using retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters for primary or secondary thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients after major trauma.

METHODS

Using data from radiology, trauma and death registries, the incidence of and risk factors for subsequent deep venous thrombosis (DVT), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and mechanical complications related to retrievable IVC filters in patients, admitted between 2007 and 2012, were assessed in a single trauma centre.

RESULTS

Of the 2940 major trauma patients admitted during the study period, a retrievable IVC filter was used in 223 patients (7.6%). Thirty-six patients (16%) developed DVT or VTE subsequent to placement of IVC filters (median 20 days, interquartile range 9-33), including 27 with lower limb (DVT), 8 upper limb DVT, and 4 pulmonary embolism. A high Injury Severity Score, tibial/fibular fractures, and a delay in initiating pharmacological thromboprophylaxis after insertion of the filters (14 vs 7 days, P=0.001) were significant risk factors. Thirty patients were lost to follow-up (13%) and their filters were not retrieved. Mechanical complications-including filters adherent to the wall of IVC (4.9%), IVC thrombus (4.0%), and displaced or tilted filters (2.2%)-were common when the filters were left in situ for >50 days.

CONCLUSIONS

A delay in initiating pharmacological thromboprophylaxis or filter removal were associated with an increased risk of subsequent DVT, VTE, and mechanical complications of retrievable IVC filters in patients after major trauma.

摘要

背景

具有出血风险的患者的理想血栓预防措施仍不明确。本回顾性队列研究评估了在主要创伤后使用可回收下腔静脉(IVC)滤器进行原发性或继发性血栓预防的患者发生并发症的危险因素。

方法

利用放射学、创伤和死亡登记处的数据,在一家单一创伤中心评估了 2007 年至 2012 年期间收治的患者中,随后发生深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)以及与可回收 IVC 滤器相关的机械并发症的发生率和危险因素。

结果

在研究期间收治的 2940 例主要创伤患者中,223 例(7.6%)使用了可回收 IVC 滤器。36 例(16%)患者在放置 IVC 滤器后发生 DVT 或 VTE(中位数 20 天,四分位距 9-33),其中 27 例为下肢(DVT),8 例为上肢 DVT,4 例为肺栓塞。高损伤严重程度评分、胫骨/腓骨骨折以及在插入滤器后延迟开始药物性血栓预防(14 天比 7 天,P=0.001)是显著的危险因素。30 例患者失访(13%),其滤器未取出。当滤器留置超过 50 天时,常见的机械并发症包括滤器贴附于 IVC 壁(4.9%)、IVC 血栓(4.0%)和滤器移位或倾斜(2.2%)。

结论

在主要创伤后患者中,延迟开始药物性血栓预防或滤器取出与随后发生 DVT、VTE 以及可回收 IVC 滤器的机械并发症风险增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验