• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量家庭成员对长期护理中临终关怀的满意度:CANHELP精简问卷的改编

Measuring Family Members' Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care in Long-Term Care: Adaptation of the CANHELP Lite Questionnaire.

作者信息

Nadin Shevaun, Miandad Mohammed Ali, Kelley Mary Lou, Marcella Jill, Heyland Daren K

机构信息

Centre for Education and Research on Aging and Health and Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5E1.

School of Social Work and Centre for Education and Research on Aging and Health, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5E1.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4621592. doi: 10.1155/2017/4621592. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1155/2017/4621592
PMID:28706945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5494554/
Abstract

RATIONALE

Improving end-of-life care (EOLC) in long-term care (LTC) homes requires quality measurement tools that assess families' satisfaction with care. This research adapted and pilot-tested an EOLC satisfaction measure (Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Lite Questionnaire) for use in LTC to measure families' perceptions of the EOLC experience and to be self-administered.

METHODS AND RESULTS

. A literature review identified key domains of satisfaction with EOLC in LTC, and original survey items were assessed for inclusiveness and relevance. Items were modified, and one item was added.

PHASE 2: The revised questionnaire was administered to 118 LTC family members and cognitive interviews were conducted. Further modifications were made including reformatting to be self-administered.

PHASE 3: The new instrument was pilot-tested with 134 family members. Importance ratings indicated good content and face validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficients (range: .88-.94) indicated internal consistency.

CONCLUSION

This research adapted and pilot-tested the CANHELP for use in LTC. This paper introduces the new, valid, internally consistent, self-administered tool (CANHELP Lite Family Caregiver LTC) that can be used to measure families' perceptions of and satisfaction with EOLC. Future research should further validate the instrument and test its usefulness for quality improvement and care planning.

摘要

理论依据

改善长期护理(LTC)机构中的临终关怀(EOLC)需要能够评估家庭对护理满意度的质量衡量工具。本研究对一种EOLC满意度测量工具(加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)简化问卷)进行了改编并进行了预测试,以便在LTC机构中使用,以衡量家庭对EOLC体验的看法并可自行填写。

方法与结果

文献综述确定了LTC机构中EOLC满意度的关键领域,并对原始调查项目的包容性和相关性进行了评估。对项目进行了修改,并增加了一个项目。

第二阶段

将修订后的问卷发放给118名LTC机构家庭成员,并进行了认知访谈。进一步修改包括重新排版以便自行填写。

第三阶段

新工具在134名家庭成员中进行了预测试。重要性评分表明内容和表面效度良好。克朗巴哈系数(范围:0.88 - 0.94)表明内部一致性。

结论

本研究对CANHELP进行了改编并在LTC机构中进行了预测试。本文介绍了一种新的、有效的、内部一致的、可自行填写的工具(CANHELP简化版家庭护理人员LTC问卷),可用于衡量家庭对EOLC的看法和满意度。未来的研究应进一步验证该工具,并测试其在质量改进和护理规划方面的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d8/5494554/a63ea93b70c8/BMRI2017-4621592.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d8/5494554/a63ea93b70c8/BMRI2017-4621592.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d8/5494554/a63ea93b70c8/BMRI2017-4621592.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring Family Members' Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care in Long-Term Care: Adaptation of the CANHELP Lite Questionnaire.测量家庭成员对长期护理中临终关怀的满意度:CANHELP精简问卷的改编
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4621592. doi: 10.1155/2017/4621592. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
The development and validation of a shorter version of the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Questionnaire (CANHELP Lite): a novel tool to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care.开发并验证了加拿大卫生保健评估项目问卷(CANHELP Lite)的简化版:一种用于衡量患者和家属对临终关怀满意度的新工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
3
The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire.开发和验证一种新的问卷,以衡量患者和家属对临终关怀的满意度:加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)问卷。
Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;24(7):682-95. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373168. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
4
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the CANHELP Lite Bereavement Questionnaire.《CANHELP Lite 丧亲问卷葡萄牙语版本的文化调适与效度验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Feb 2;8(1):27. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010027.
5
Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.定义加拿大改善临终关怀的优先事项。
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):E747-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100131. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
6
Bereaved family members' perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care across four types of inpatient care settings.四类住院治疗环境中,丧亲家庭成员对临终关怀质量的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 25;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0237-5.
7
Sense of community in long-term care: the views of family caregivers of elderly military veterans.长期护理中的社区感:老年退伍军人家庭照顾者的观点。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Mar;25(3):390-402. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001524. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
8
Assessing the validity and intra-observer agreement of the MIDAM-LTC; an instrument measuring factors that influence personal dignity in long-term care facilities.评估MIDAM-LTC的有效性和观察者内部一致性;一种测量长期护理机构中影响个人尊严因素的工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Feb 11;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-17.
9
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
10
Factors affecting family satisfaction with inpatient end-of-life care.影响家庭对住院临终关怀满意度的因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e110860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110860. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long Term Care (SPA-LTC) programme: a protocol of a cluster randomised control trial.强化长期护理中的缓和医疗方法(SPA-LTC)方案的评价:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 25;13(10):e073585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073585.
2
Evaluating the Implementation of the Conversation Starter Kit in Long Term Care.评估对话启动工具包在长期护理中的实施情况。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Nov 1;7:23779608211051824. doi: 10.1177/23779608211051824. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Palliative and end-of-life care in care homes: protocol for codesigning and implementing an appropriate scalable model of Needs Rounds in the UK.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care for chronic illness: driving change.慢性病的姑息治疗:推动变革。
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E493-E498. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151454. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
2
Measuring the quality of life of people at the end of life: The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised.测量临终患者的生活质量:修订版麦吉尔生活质量问卷。
Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31(2):120-129. doi: 10.1177/0269216316659603. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Conceptual foundations of a palliative approach: a knowledge synthesis.姑息治疗方法的概念基础:知识综合
安养院的姑息治疗和终末期关怀:在英国共同设计和实施适当的、可扩展的需求评估轮模型的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e049486. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049486.
4
Reliability and Validity Testing of the FAMCARE-2 Scale: Thai Translation.FAMCARE-2量表的信效度检验:泰语翻译
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 May 15;7(3):280-286. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_5_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
5
The Impact of Prior Advance Care Planning Documentation on End-of-Life Care Provision in Long-Term Care.既往预先护理计划文件对长期护理中临终关怀提供的影响。
Can Geriatr J. 2020 May 1;23(2):172-183. doi: 10.5770/cgj.23.386. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the CANHELP Lite Bereavement Questionnaire.《CANHELP Lite 丧亲问卷葡萄牙语版本的文化调适与效度验证》
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Feb 2;8(1):27. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010027.
7
What are essential elements of high-quality palliative care at home? An interview study among patients and relatives faced with advanced cancer.居家高质量姑息治疗的基本要素有哪些?一项针对晚期癌症患者和家属的访谈研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Nov 6;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0485-7.
8
Communicating Health Information at the End of Life: The Caregivers' Perspectives.临终关怀中的健康信息沟通:照顾者的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142469.
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 15;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0076-9.
4
Dying With Carolyn: Using Simulation to Improve Communication Skills of Unregulated Care Providers Working in Long-Term Care.与卡罗琳一同面对死亡:运用模拟技术提升长期护理领域非正规护理人员的沟通技巧
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Dec;35(12):1259-1278. doi: 10.1177/0733464815577139. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
5
Death in Long-term Care: A Brief Report Examining Factors Associated with Death within 31 Days of Assessment.长期护理中的死亡:一份关于评估后31天内死亡相关因素的简要报告
Palliat Care. 2015 Feb 1;9:1-5. doi: 10.4137/PCRT.S20347. eCollection 2015.
6
Comfort Care Rounds: a staff capacity-building initiative in long-term care homes.舒适护理查房:长期护理机构中的一项员工能力建设举措。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2015 Jan;41(1):42-8. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140611-01. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
"Avoidable" emergency department transfers from long-term care homes: a brief review.
Healthc Q. 2013;16(2):13-5.
8
A review of advance care planning programs in long-term care homes: are they dementia friendly?对长期护理机构中预先护理计划项目的综述:它们对痴呆症患者友好吗?
Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:875897. doi: 10.1155/2014/875897. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
9
Using a book chat to improve attitudes and perceptions of long-term care staff about dementia.
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 May;40(5):46-52. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140110-02. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Just ask: discussing goals of care with patients in hospital with serious illness.只需询问:与重症住院患者讨论护理目标。
CMAJ. 2014 Apr 1;186(6):425-32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121274. Epub 2013 Jul 15.