Suppr超能文献

测量家庭成员对长期护理中临终关怀的满意度:CANHELP精简问卷的改编

Measuring Family Members' Satisfaction with End-of-Life Care in Long-Term Care: Adaptation of the CANHELP Lite Questionnaire.

作者信息

Nadin Shevaun, Miandad Mohammed Ali, Kelley Mary Lou, Marcella Jill, Heyland Daren K

机构信息

Centre for Education and Research on Aging and Health and Department of Health Sciences, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5E1.

School of Social Work and Centre for Education and Research on Aging and Health, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5E1.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4621592. doi: 10.1155/2017/4621592. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Improving end-of-life care (EOLC) in long-term care (LTC) homes requires quality measurement tools that assess families' satisfaction with care. This research adapted and pilot-tested an EOLC satisfaction measure (Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Lite Questionnaire) for use in LTC to measure families' perceptions of the EOLC experience and to be self-administered.

METHODS AND RESULTS

. A literature review identified key domains of satisfaction with EOLC in LTC, and original survey items were assessed for inclusiveness and relevance. Items were modified, and one item was added.

PHASE 2: The revised questionnaire was administered to 118 LTC family members and cognitive interviews were conducted. Further modifications were made including reformatting to be self-administered.

PHASE 3: The new instrument was pilot-tested with 134 family members. Importance ratings indicated good content and face validity. Cronbach's alpha coefficients (range: .88-.94) indicated internal consistency.

CONCLUSION

This research adapted and pilot-tested the CANHELP for use in LTC. This paper introduces the new, valid, internally consistent, self-administered tool (CANHELP Lite Family Caregiver LTC) that can be used to measure families' perceptions of and satisfaction with EOLC. Future research should further validate the instrument and test its usefulness for quality improvement and care planning.

摘要

理论依据

改善长期护理(LTC)机构中的临终关怀(EOLC)需要能够评估家庭对护理满意度的质量衡量工具。本研究对一种EOLC满意度测量工具(加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)简化问卷)进行了改编并进行了预测试,以便在LTC机构中使用,以衡量家庭对EOLC体验的看法并可自行填写。

方法与结果

文献综述确定了LTC机构中EOLC满意度的关键领域,并对原始调查项目的包容性和相关性进行了评估。对项目进行了修改,并增加了一个项目。

第二阶段

将修订后的问卷发放给118名LTC机构家庭成员,并进行了认知访谈。进一步修改包括重新排版以便自行填写。

第三阶段

新工具在134名家庭成员中进行了预测试。重要性评分表明内容和表面效度良好。克朗巴哈系数(范围:0.88 - 0.94)表明内部一致性。

结论

本研究对CANHELP进行了改编并在LTC机构中进行了预测试。本文介绍了一种新的、有效的、内部一致的、可自行填写的工具(CANHELP简化版家庭护理人员LTC问卷),可用于衡量家庭对EOLC的看法和满意度。未来的研究应进一步验证该工具,并测试其在质量改进和护理规划方面的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14d8/5494554/a63ea93b70c8/BMRI2017-4621592.001.jpg

相似文献

4
5
Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):E747-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100131. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
7
Sense of community in long-term care: the views of family caregivers of elderly military veterans.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Mar;25(3):390-402. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001524. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
10
Factors affecting family satisfaction with inpatient end-of-life care.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e110860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110860. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluating the Implementation of the Conversation Starter Kit in Long Term Care.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Nov 1;7:23779608211051824. doi: 10.1177/23779608211051824. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Reliability and Validity Testing of the FAMCARE-2 Scale: Thai Translation.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2020 May 15;7(3):280-286. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_5_20. eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.
5
The Impact of Prior Advance Care Planning Documentation on End-of-Life Care Provision in Long-Term Care.
Can Geriatr J. 2020 May 1;23(2):172-183. doi: 10.5770/cgj.23.386. eCollection 2020 Jun.
6
8
Communicating Health Information at the End of Life: The Caregivers' Perspectives.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2469. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142469.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care for chronic illness: driving change.
CMAJ. 2016 Dec 6;188(17-18):E493-E498. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151454. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
2
Measuring the quality of life of people at the end of life: The McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised.
Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;31(2):120-129. doi: 10.1177/0269216316659603. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Conceptual foundations of a palliative approach: a knowledge synthesis.
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 15;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0076-9.
4
Dying With Carolyn: Using Simulation to Improve Communication Skills of Unregulated Care Providers Working in Long-Term Care.
J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Dec;35(12):1259-1278. doi: 10.1177/0733464815577139. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
5
Death in Long-term Care: A Brief Report Examining Factors Associated with Death within 31 Days of Assessment.
Palliat Care. 2015 Feb 1;9:1-5. doi: 10.4137/PCRT.S20347. eCollection 2015.
6
Comfort Care Rounds: a staff capacity-building initiative in long-term care homes.
J Gerontol Nurs. 2015 Jan;41(1):42-8. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140611-01. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
A review of advance care planning programs in long-term care homes: are they dementia friendly?
Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:875897. doi: 10.1155/2014/875897. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
9
Using a book chat to improve attitudes and perceptions of long-term care staff about dementia.
J Gerontol Nurs. 2014 May;40(5):46-52. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20140110-02. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Just ask: discussing goals of care with patients in hospital with serious illness.
CMAJ. 2014 Apr 1;186(6):425-32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121274. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验