• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响家庭对住院临终关怀满意度的因素。

Factors affecting family satisfaction with inpatient end-of-life care.

作者信息

Sadler Erin, Hales Brigette, Henry Blair, Xiong Wei, Myers Jeff, Wynnychuk Lesia, Taggar Ru, Heyland Daren, Fowler Robert

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Quality and Patient Safety, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e110860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110860. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0110860
PMID:25401710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4234251/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little data exists addressing satisfaction with end-of-life care among hospitalized patients, as they and their family members are systematically excluded from routine satisfaction surveys. It is imperative that we closely examine patient and institution factors associated with quality end-of-life care and determine high-priority target areas for quality improvement.

METHODS

Between September 1, 2010 and January 1, 2012 the Canadian Health care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Bereavement Questionnaire was mailed to the next-of-kin of recently deceased inpatients to seek factors associated with satisfaction with end-of-life care. The primary outcome was the global rating of satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included rates of actual versus preferred location of death, associations between demographic factors and global satisfaction, and identification of targets for quality improvement.

RESULTS

Response rate was 33% among 275 valid addresses. Overall, 67.4% of respondents were very or completely satisfied with the overall quality of care their relative received. However, 71.4% of respondents who thought their relative did not die in their preferred location favoured an out-of-hospital location of death. A common location of death was the intensive care unit (45.7%); however, this was not the preferred location of death for 47.6% of such patients. Multivariate Poisson regression analysis showed respondents who believed their relative died in their preferred location were 1.7 times more likely to be satisfied with the end-of-life care that was provided (p = 0.001). Items identified as high-priority targets for improvement included: relationships with, and characteristics of health care professionals; illness management; communication; and end-of-life decision-making.

INTERPRETATION

Nearly three-quarters of recently deceased inpatients would have preferred an out-of-hospital death. Intensive care units were a common, but not preferred, location of in-hospital deaths. Family satisfaction with end-of-life care was strongly associated with their relative dying in their preferred location. Improved communication regarding end-of-life care preferences should be a high-priority quality improvement target.

摘要

背景

关于住院患者临终关怀满意度的数据很少,因为他们及其家属被系统性地排除在常规满意度调查之外。我们必须仔细研究与高质量临终关怀相关的患者和机构因素,并确定质量改进的高优先级目标领域。

方法

在2010年9月1日至2012年1月1日期间,加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)的丧亲问卷被邮寄给最近去世的住院患者的近亲,以寻找与临终关怀满意度相关的因素。主要结果是总体满意度评分。次要结果包括实际死亡地点与首选死亡地点的比率、人口统计学因素与总体满意度之间的关联,以及确定质量改进目标。

结果

在275个有效地址中,回复率为33%。总体而言,67.4%的受访者对其亲属接受的护理总体质量非常满意或完全满意。然而,71.4%认为其亲属未在首选地点死亡的受访者倾向于院外死亡地点。常见的死亡地点是重症监护病房(45.7%);然而,47.6%的此类患者并不首选该地点。多变量泊松回归分析显示,认为其亲属在首选地点死亡的受访者对所提供的临终关怀感到满意的可能性高出1.7倍(p = 0.001)。被确定为高优先级改进目标的项目包括:与医护人员的关系及其特征;疾病管理;沟通;以及临终决策。

解读

近四分之三最近去世的住院患者更倾向于院外死亡。重症监护病房是医院内死亡的常见但非首选地点。家属对临终关怀的满意度与其亲属在首选地点死亡密切相关。改善关于临终关怀偏好的沟通应是高优先级的质量改进目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b96/4234251/72a00e3202af/pone.0110860.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b96/4234251/72a00e3202af/pone.0110860.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b96/4234251/72a00e3202af/pone.0110860.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors affecting family satisfaction with inpatient end-of-life care.影响家庭对住院临终关怀满意度的因素。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e110860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110860. eCollection 2014.
2
Bereaved family members' perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care across four types of inpatient care settings.四类住院治疗环境中,丧亲家庭成员对临终关怀质量的看法。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Nov 25;16(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0237-5.
3
Evaluating satisfaction with the quality and provision of end-of-life care for patients from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds.评估不同种族文化背景患者对临终关怀质量和服务的满意度。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Sep 17;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00841-z.
4
Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.定义加拿大改善临终关怀的优先事项。
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):E747-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100131. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
5
The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire.开发和验证一种新的问卷,以衡量患者和家属对临终关怀的满意度:加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)问卷。
Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;24(7):682-95. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373168. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
6
Family Perspectives on Aggressive Cancer Care Near the End of Life.家庭对临终前积极癌症治疗的看法。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):284-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18604.
7
Preferences for location of death of seriously ill hospitalized patients: perspectives from Canadian patients and their family caregivers.重症住院患者对死亡地点的偏好:来自加拿大患者及其家庭护理人员的观点。
Palliat Med. 2008 Jan;22(1):85-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216307084612.
8
The development and validation of a shorter version of the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project Questionnaire (CANHELP Lite): a novel tool to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care.开发并验证了加拿大卫生保健评估项目问卷(CANHELP Lite)的简化版:一种用于衡量患者和家属对临终关怀满意度的新工具。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
9
Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results.评估重症监护病房患者家属对护理的满意度:一份问卷的编制及初步结果
J Crit Care. 2001 Dec;16(4):142-9. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2001.30163.
10
Dying in the ICU: perspectives of family members.在重症监护病房离世:家属的观点
Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):392-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.392.

引用本文的文献

1
Beliefs of physician directors on the management of devastating brain injuries at the Canadian emergency department and intensive care unit interface: a national site-level survey.加拿大急诊部门和重症监护病房界面处主治医生对毁灭性脑损伤处理的信念:全国现场层面调查。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;71(8):1145-1153. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02749-7. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
2
End-of-Life Experiences Among "Kinless" Older Adults: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.“无子女”老年人的临终体验:一项全国范围的基于登记的研究。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Aug;26(8):1056-1063. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0490. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
3
A qualitative study exploring challenges and solutions to negotiating goals of care at the end of life in hospital settings.

本文引用的文献

1
Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning.未能预先让住院老年患者及其家属参与到预先护理计划中。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):778-87. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180.
2
Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys.调查中的回应率和无回应误差。
JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1805-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3532.
3
Patient and healthcare professional factors influencing end-of-life decision-making during critical illness: a systematic review.影响危重病患者生命终末期决策的患者和医疗保健专业人员因素:系统评价。
一项探索在医院环境中协商临终关怀目标所面临的挑战和解决方案的定性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Nov 23;34(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac089.
4
Municipal Characteristics of In-Home Death Among Care-Dependent Older Japanese Adults.居家死亡的日本老年照护依赖者的城市特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142273. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42273.
5
Association of the Frequency of In-Home Care Services Utilization and the Probability of In-Home Death.居家护理服务利用频率与居家死亡概率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2132787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32787.
6
Predictors of the final place of care of patients with advanced cancer receiving integrated home-based palliative care: a retrospective cohort study.接受综合家庭姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者最终护理地点的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 18;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00865-5.
7
Evaluating satisfaction with the quality and provision of end-of-life care for patients from diverse ethnocultural backgrounds.评估不同种族文化背景患者对临终关怀质量和服务的满意度。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Sep 17;20(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00841-z.
8
Place of death associated with types of long-term care services near the end-of-life for home-dwelling older people in Japan: a pooled cross-sectional study.日本居家老年人临终前长期护理服务类型与死亡地点的相关性:一项汇总的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 9;19(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00622-0.
9
Dying in acute hospitals: voices of bereaved relatives.在急症医院去世:失去亲人的亲属的声音。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 31;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0464-z.
10
Receiving the home care service offered by certified care workers prior to a patients' death and the probability of a home death: observational research using an instrumental variable method from Japan.在患者死亡前接受认证护理人员提供的家庭护理服务与在家中死亡的概率:来自日本的使用工具变量方法的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e026238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026238.
Crit Care Med. 2011 May;39(5):1174-89. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eacf2.
4
Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.定义加拿大改善临终关怀的优先事项。
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 9;182(16):E747-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.100131. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
5
The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire.开发和验证一种新的问卷,以衡量患者和家属对临终关怀的满意度:加拿大医疗保健评估项目(CANHELP)问卷。
Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;24(7):682-95. doi: 10.1177/0269216310373168. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
6
A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians.临床医生自行开展调查的设计与实施指南。
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):245-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080372.
7
A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life.对临终关怀满意度的系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Jan;56(1):124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01507.x. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
8
Translating family satisfaction data into quality improvement.将家庭满意度数据转化为质量改进。
Crit Care Med. 2004 Sep;32(9):1922-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000139920.53790.61.
9
A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.一种用于二元数据前瞻性研究的修正泊松回归方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090.
10
Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care.家属对临终关怀最后场所的看法。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):88-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.88.