• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在集中的视空间注意力中没有觉醒偏向的竞争。

No arousal-biased competition in focused visuospatial attention.

机构信息

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, The Netherlands; University of Akureyri, Iceland.

Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:191-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.001
PMID:28709109
Abstract

Arousal sometimes enhances and sometimes impairs perception and memory. A recent theory attempts to reconcile these findings by proposing that arousal amplifies the competition between stimulus representations, strengthening already strong representations and weakening already weak representations. Here, we report a stringent test of this arousal-biased competition theory in the context of focused visuospatial attention. Participants were required to identify a briefly presented target in the context of multiple distractors, which varied in the degree to which they competed for representation with the target, as revealed by psychophysics. We manipulated arousal using emotionally arousing pictures (Experiment 1), alerting tones (Experiment 2) and white-noise stimulation (Experiment 3), and validated these manipulations with electroencephalography and pupillometry. In none of the experiments did we find evidence that arousal modulated the effect of distractor competition on the accuracy of target identification. Bayesian statistics revealed moderate to strong evidence against arousal-biased competition. Modeling of the psychophysical data based on Bundesen's (1990) theory of visual attention corroborated the conclusion that arousal does not bias competition in focused visuospatial attention.

摘要

唤醒有时会增强,有时会损害感知和记忆。最近的一种理论试图通过提出唤醒放大了刺激表示之间的竞争来调和这些发现,从而增强已经强的表示,削弱已经弱的表示。在这里,我们在集中的视觉注意力的背景下,对这种唤醒偏向竞争的理论进行了严格的测试。参与者被要求在多个干扰物的背景下识别一个短暂呈现的目标,这些干扰物与目标竞争表示的程度通过心理物理学来揭示。我们使用情绪唤醒的图片(实验 1)、警示音(实验 2)和白噪声刺激(实验 3)来操纵唤醒,并通过脑电图和瞳孔测量来验证这些操纵。在所有实验中,我们都没有发现证据表明唤醒调节了干扰竞争对目标识别准确性的影响。贝叶斯统计显示,有中等至强的证据反对唤醒偏向竞争。基于 Bundesen(1990 年)视觉注意理论的心理物理学数据建模证实了唤醒不会偏向集中的视觉注意力竞争的结论。

相似文献

1
No arousal-biased competition in focused visuospatial attention.在集中的视空间注意力中没有觉醒偏向的竞争。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:191-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
2
Effects of arousal on biased competition in attention and short-term memory.觉醒对注意力和短期记忆中偏向竞争的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):1901-1912. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01756-x.
3
Visual noise effects on emotion perception: brain potentials and stimulus identification.视觉噪声对情绪感知的影响:脑电活动及刺激识别
Neuroreport. 2008 Jan 22;19(2):167-71. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f4aa42.
4
Temporal dynamics of face selection mechanism in the context of similar and dissimilar faces: ERP evidence for biased competition within the ventral occipito-temporal cortex using ICA.使用独立成分分析技术,在相似和不同面孔的情境下,对腹侧枕颞皮质内的竞争偏向进行探究,得出面孔选择机制的时程动态的脑电证据。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):682-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
5
Early and late selection modulate competition for representation: Evidence from the N2pc in a multiple frame procedure.早期和晚期选择调节表征竞争:来自多框架程序中N2pc的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):611-22. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12606. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
6
The effect of phasic auditory alerting on visual perception.阶段性听觉警报对视觉感知的影响。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Blinded by emotion: target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP.受情绪蒙蔽:在快速序列视觉呈现中,目标错失源于被唤起的干扰物引起的注意捕获。
Emotion. 2007 Aug;7(3):465-77. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.465.
8
Neurobehavioral correlates of the rapid formation of the symbolic control of visuospatial attention.神经行为相关性研究:快速形成视觉空间注意力的符号控制。
Psychophysiology. 2011 Sep;48(9):1227-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01193.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
9
Event-related potentials dissociate effects of salience and space in biased competition for visual representation.事件相关电位分离突显和空间效应对视觉表象竞争的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Sep 16;5(9):e12677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012677.
10
Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.被记住但未被使用:工作记忆中不引导注意力的附属项目。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1081-91. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21083.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye movement evidence for locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system contributions to age differences in attention.蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素系统对注意力年龄差异影响的眼动证据
Psychol Aging. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1037/pag0000930.
2
Readiness for Perception and Action: Towards a More Mechanistic Understanding of Phasic Alertness.感知与行动的准备状态:迈向对阶段性警觉更具机制性的理解
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 21;8(1):19. doi: 10.5334/joc.426. eCollection 2025.
3
Eye movements reveal age differences in how arousal modulates saliency priority but not attention processing speed.
眼动揭示了在唤醒如何调节显著性优先级而非注意力处理速度方面的年龄差异。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 8:2024.05.06.592619. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.06.592619.
4
Phasic alerting in visual search tasks.视觉搜索任务中的阶段性警觉。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):707-716. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02844-3. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
The effect of emotional arousal on visual attentional performance: a systematic review.情绪唤醒对视觉注意力表现的影响:系统综述。
Psychol Res. 2024 Feb;88(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01852-6. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
6
Attentional bias during emotional processing: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an Emotional Flanker Task.情绪加工中的注意偏向:情绪侧翼任务的行为和电生理证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 2;16(4):e0249407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249407. eCollection 2021.